Crossfit – A Cool Idea, Poorly Implemented

The article stems from a quote from my previous article on the problems with the paleo diet, “Crossfit, a popular and generally-looked-down-upon, dangerous and poorly-implemented fitness fad…”

“What did you mean by that?  Hang on just a second!  You can’t slam Crossfit!  Crossfit is the shit!  Crossfit has made me the badass I am today!  Crossfit isn’t for pu$$!eS .  Clearly you can’t handle it.”

…well, this is how I imagine the response.  I’m sure the Crossfit community is more dignified than that, so what is the story?  Why do I exaggerate such a barbaric response?

Because of the paleo-centric community.

I wish I could say that I’m sorry for being unfair, but I can’t.  I devoted several weeks to researching the plant-based vs. paleo camps, and read dozens of meticulously written articles, and then spent many hours combing through each of their avalanches of comments and the links contained within.

I was absolutely appalled by what I read.  While plant-based enthusiasts are not immune to being petty and insulting, the paleo community had it in spades.  There is something about glorifying man as a meat-eating ,savage, athletic, shirtless, smooth-chested stud that gets the paleo people up in arms whenever you suggest that man really wasn’t that impressive–and that he didn’t gorge himself on delicious meat.

By comparison, man is a skinny, hairless, weak-looking dweeb who was smart enough to use tools to scavenge leftovers, steal eggs from nests, and eat his own parasites.  He was lean, wiry, and as strong as his environment functionally permitted him to be.

Rest assured, nothing in the paleolithic environment resembled a gym.

The fact that the paleo movement and Crossfit are married makes me shudder at the thought of receiving paleo community backlash.  Seriously.

I admit this might be my way of criticizing those same hyper-defensive paleo people (not all paleo people are assholes).  This time I’m striking at the paleo cult from a different angle: Crossfit–the holy grail of paleo fitness.

For the record, I don’t hate Crossfit.  I like it a lot.  Really.  A lot.  I still do it.

THE PROS:

  • Crossfit is the most efficient training protocol I have ever encountered (up there with RKC) when measuring gains spread broadly over power, speed, and medium muscular endurance.
  • The dietary guidelines are perfectly sensible for its aim and scope.
  • Crossfit teaches mental toughness in a way unlike most training regimes.
  • It offers a wide variety of workout styles, and keeps things interesting, both on a metabolic level, and for entertainment purposes.
  • Crossfit focuses predominantly on functional training exercises, dismissing isolated lifting and long bouts of cardio.
  • When executed smartly, Crossfit makes fitness animals who are prepared for just about anything life can throw at them.
  • The Crossfit Website is an amazing free resource and exercise library, full of tutorials for anyone seeking a better understanding of its core movements.

THE CONS, or at least THINGS TO CONSIDER:

  • The Crossfit I certification is too easy to obtainand serves as a money-making scheme, as well as a stepping stone for it’s Level II certification, required for its franchise.  Crossfit may very well be the most rapidly expanding fitness franchise out there.
  • Lack of depth and understanding in its certification - a Crossfit certification demonstrates that you have sufficient understanding of Crossfit methodology, in order to pass a short test at the end of a two-day seminar.  Understanding Crossfit methodology is not the same as understanding exercise physiology. Most training certifications, for those with no B.S. in anatomy, kinesiology, of physiology, takes at least several months to study for, and the tests are proctored.  Furthermore, most reputable certifications require regular continuing education courses, to ensure that fitness professionals are staying current with the trends and findings in exercise physiology.  The fitness industry is plagued with bad certifications, and only a handful of nationally recognized certifications carry any weight in the fitness industry.  Having a Crossfit certification means little more than having a certification in TRX Suspension training, and should only be considered supplemental to any trainer’s list of qualifications.
  • Inattentive and/or unqualified trainers - I could be wrong. I haven’t looked up the resume skirt.  But the proof is in the pudding.  I have witnessed it with my own eyes, and there is a plethora of video on youtube demonstrating this fact: that Crossfit’s attention to safety and form is lacking.  This leads me to believe that many Crossfit instructors have no idea how to correctly teach Olympic and Power lifts; or if they do, they certainly do not care if the trainee is performing these lifts properly.  Olympic and Power lifts are not things to play around with.  It is extremely easy to hurt yourself, and it happens all the time, which leads me to the next point…
  • Insanely high rate of injury - This is a multi-faceted problem.  First, Crossfit seeks intensity and speed in favor of safety.  The lifts are so physically demanding, the metabolic pathways so punishing when mixed and matched, that the trainee fatigues rapidly, leaving room for error.  Second, Crossfit relies heavily on medium muscular endurance activities which, at a high enough and sloppy intensity, can easily cause overuse injury.  Third, quantity is favored over quality.  ”Come on, push!  You got this!  One more!” as someone struggles under the weight of their hang clean caught at their stomach, rather than in an appropriate rack position.
  • Business modelAside from being a rapidly expanding franchise, Crossfit has capitalized on the next biggest thing in fitness: group training.  Group training is both cost-effective and motivating for the trainee, and the intensity of group training usually helps provide a better workout.  Group fitness has known this for years; group training is supposed to be a compromise between group fitness and private training.  Crossfit workouts are usually drop-in, as trainees purchase entry on a month-to-month basis, or class packages.  The affordability of Crossfit (along with its cultish ambiance) makes for an easy revenue stream.  The groups, in my opinion, are usually too large and cannot be appropriately monitored.  If someone gets hurt, its easy to fill his spot.  People are always coming through the door, transfixed by the heavy metal music, grunting, and slamming of weights by sweat-soaked, shirtless animals.
  • Lack of training infrasctructure – Huh? This will depend on the location, for sure, as well as the quality of training and instructor staff.  In large part, Crossfit lacks scaled training options for beginners, people with contraindications, and people with significant muscle-skeletal imbalances.  Crossfit is only appropriate for healthy, well-moving people, and lacks programming for everyone else.
  • Vomiting – I have no idea why this is considered a badge of honor.  Vomiting from a workout says only one thing to me: you’re out of shape.  I’ve trained with dozens of truly elite athletes.  They don’t vomit after their races.  Ever.  Furthermore, the people most likely to experience vomiting and dizziness during or after a workout are those who are just getting started in a training program.  If anything, the high rates of vomiting speak only to the volume of amateurs embarking on the very technical aspects of Crossfit, and thus putting themselves in danger.
  • Lack of logic in program design/ no program design – In other words, there is only one goal for anyone in Crossfit: to be a badass.  That’s it.  For anyone with specific fitness goals, I recommend going somewhere else.  Exercises are neither good nor bad; they are simply appropriate or inappropriate with respect to the trainee’s goals.
  • “Oh my god, I’m soo sore!”Giving someone 150 of anything will make him sore.  Any trainer, if he’s any good, can make you ungodly sore in 20 minutes.  That’s not an accomplishment.  Over-training large muscle groups isn’t a skill.  Fine-tuning smaller, more stabilizing muscle groups with patience and precision is more difficult.
  • Crossfit is not “elite” athleticsCrossfit enthusiasts are typically only good at one thing: Crossfit.  Crossfit has no specialization outside of the scope of itself.  It doesn’t seem to have any progressive training protocol to prepare its athletes for upper-level competition in anything, even its own Crossfit games.
  • Introductory exercises are anything but introductory – If a seasoned athlete or skilled gym rat enters a Crossfit gym, he’s got a pretty decent chance of doing well in his first week, especially if he’s coordinated.  But the complexity of compound movements, for most people, cannot be taught or understood in a day, or even a week.  It must be taught in a dedicated and progressive manner.  One under-appreciated compound movement used by Crossfit is the rowing stroke on a Concept II ergometer.  I have yet to see one Crossfit member or instructor perform a single stroke properly.

Obviously, I’m generalizing.  Rest assured, there are some great, disciplined, serious Crossfit affiliate gyms out there.  Crossfit is like personal training: there are good trainers and bad trainers.

I liked Crossfit when I first got involved.  It put a whole new spin on fitness; but I was a young, impressionable, and inexperienced trainer at the time.

I got insanely fit from doing the workouts on their website, and by daily conferring with a hot meat-heat named Brad (of all names!).  I did well with Crossfit, possibly because I’d already had training in the technical lifts from my collegiate rowing years, but mostly because I had an insanely large aerobic base to work with, and did not fatigue easily.  Busting my butt for 15 minutes was nothing, so I started designing my own Crossfit-style workouts to last 45 minutes to an hour.

Years later, I ended up doing WODs with a group of guys who were just about to open their own Crossfit gym across the street from mine.  I liked working out with these guys; and I beat them–every time (Crossfit will never give you the stamina of years of aerobic base training, to be fair).  They then offered me a job.  I declined, preferring to travel to Europe.

As I got older, the awe of Crossfit waned.  I met too many people who got hurt; I spoke with too many Crossfit certified trainers who identified its short-comings.  My style of training shifted into the direction of smart training, not insane training.

Oh Crossfit, I don’t hate you.  I just think you have a lot of design flaws.  If the masses of under-qualified trainers and over-zealous trainees would pause to consider these design flaws, you might not have such a controversial reputation.

The Problem With The “Fat Acceptance” Movement: thoughts on Jennifer Livingston, The Yale Rudd Center, and more.

I’m going out on a limb here, but I’ve been thinking about this issue more and more, especially after the Jennifer Livingston headline.

Jennifer Livingston is a female news anchor who spoke out against a letter she received from a by-chance viewer of her show.  The letter criticized her for being overweight.  The author wrote: “Obesity is one of the worst choices a person can make and one of the most dangerous habits to maintain. I leave you this note hoping you’ll reconsider your responsibility as a local public personality to present and promote a healthy lifestyle.”  The statement was made with respect to the fact that her “physical condition” had not improved for quite some time.

Now, when you hear the letter, it does sound harsh.  My initial reaction was, “Man, that guy’s a D-bag.”  It’s really not about the content, so much as the delivery, right?

But when you listen to the letter and pick it apart sentence by sentence, you should see that he was stating his opinions matter-of-factly.  It just so happens that harping on a woman for her weight isn’t generally considered a nice thing to do.

Livingston retaliated with:

The truth is, I am overweight … But to the person who wrote me that letter, do you think I don’t know that? That your cruel words are pointing out something that I don’t see? You don’t know me… so you know nothing about me but what you see on the outside and I am much more than a number on a scale… I leave you with this: To all of the children out there who feel lost, who are struggling with your weight, with the color of your skin, your sexual preference, your disability, even the acne on your face, listen to me right now: do not let your self-worth be defined by bullies. Learn from my experience — that the cruel words of one are nothing compared to the shouts of many.

Nice response.  She really made a case against bullying.  Against heckling.  Against unfair prejudice.  It was awesome!

Nothing about what this guy said, however, was out of line–and he wasn’t being a bully.  That’s what I think, and I’m sticking to my guns.

Ms. Livingston, by addressing the “children,” takes the spotlight off herself–perhaps because she was accused of being a bad role model for young people.  But there is a difference between being an obese child and being an obese adult.

Children are not in control of their food.  They are beholden to their parents.  Children are usually not in control of their own rational faculties, due in large part to lack of cognitive development, and ignorance induced by a lack of life experience and an inundation of junk food marketing.

But adults don’t have these excuses.  We know why we’re fat.

Now being overweight is one thing.  It is understandable, considering our environment (which is strongly structured to promote fat), that this happens.  The majority of us are overweight.  We get it.  We know why.  This is not news.  There’s time for change.  Let’s make it!

But being inordinately fat–that is obese–is another thing.  It is up there with the most unhealthy things you can choose for yourself.  In the end, I believe obesity-related illnesses will bankrupt our health care system.

Being overweight is usually a sign of temporary negligence, but being obese is a sign of long-term negligence and often out-right denial.

I’ll say from my own experience as a trainer (with a designation in Weight Management Coaching) meeting with potential clients and performing their physical screenings and body fat analyses that overweight people are frequently at the gym trying to correct their health.  Obese people are not.  The are under-represented at the gym

There are many reasons for this: embarrassment, low levels of self-efficacy, denial, feelings of defeat, lack of access, lack of volition.  Obese people face a cascade of emotional and medical conditions that actually prevent them from taking corrective steps in their health.  And morbidly obese people have it even worse; at that point, they become so chemically and behaviorally imbalanced that normal body weight, even if achieved, can be fleeting.

(Keep that in mind!  There is a point of no-return–albeit, it is way out there on the spectrum of fat.  Having seen numerous exposes on morbidly obese individuals trying to save their own lives from food addiction, I learned that many of these individuals keep the weight off until something stressful occurs.  Once that happens, the addictive food behaviors return, and the weight comes back.)

We should do what we can to avoid obesity and reduce the number of overweight.

One of my favorite websites is The Yale Rudd Center For Food Policy & Obesity, founded by Dr. Kelly Brownell, author of Food Fight: The inside story of the food industry, America’s obesity crisis, and what we can do out it.

This book, dear readers, is the very first book I ever read about food and public health, in 2004, when I was but a sophomore in college, and this book was all over Yale bookstores.

First, a little back story:

I was a 100-lb 8-year old.  Then a 150-lb 10-year old.  By 14, I was 209 lbs.  Despite my high levels of physical activity (I played hard), I was a fat kid.  In the Presidential Physical Fitness Test inflicted upon middle-schoolers, I ran (more like staggered through) The Mile in over 12 minutes.  My gym teacher turned off the clock and asked me to come in early.

I took up sports in high school, and went from 209 lbs to 172 lbs in one year.  Then, over the course of three years due to negligent and emotional eating, plus boozing, I hit 222lbs.

I tried to enroll in R.O.T.C. to help pay for college.  The army didn’t want me because my body fat percentage was 30.5%, just half a percentage point over their cut-off.  I was pissed.  I was fat, sure, but so what?!   I was a great athlete!

What I failed to realize at that time was that I wasn’t the athlete I used to be–that I had become so fat (again) that I could barely clear the volleyball net.

As luck would have it, I found rowing, and my size was advantageous only because it was correlated with strength. But at the beginning of my sophomore year in college, when my coach told me I had Olympic potential, and that the US National Team would never take me seriously if I didn’t get my weight down, I had a revelation.

What you put in your mouth makes all the difference.

I read Brownell’s book and realized he was talking about me.  That my over-indulgence, my drinking, my absent-minded eating, more poor food choices, and my non-healthy friends and environments were making me fat.

Needless to say, I’m grateful to Brownell for his book.  He would also teach its content as a class.  Shortly thereafter, he started the Yale Rudd Center.

What struck me about Brownell, oddly, was that he is fat.

The Yale Rudd Center was once an organization for the exposure of unfair food marketing practices, food addiction, and policy changes.  But over time, it also took on fat acceptance, weight bias, and prejudice.

I must wonder… I really must.  Would the Yale Rudd Center have focused so much on weight bias if Brownell himself were a normal weight?

*Disclaiming wave of the hands*  Jennifer Livingston would tell me that I don’t know a thing about Brownell–that he’s more than just a number on the scale.  Clearly!  I love that guy!  I mean, I owe my own waist-line to him.

But I’m in slight disagreement with his attention on fat acceptance.  The site states:

Despite increased attention to the obesity epidemic, little has been done to stop the bias and discrimination that obese children and adults face every day. The social consequences of obesity include discrimination in employment, barriers in education, biased attitudes from health care professionals, stereotypes in the media, and stigma in interpersonal relationships. All these factors reduce quality of life for vast numbers of overweight and obese people and have both immediate and long-term consequences for their emotional and physical health.  The Rudd Center aims to stop the stigma through research, education, and advocacy

True, true.  Discrimination sucks.  Bullying is mean.  It is hard to be fat.  If you’re fat, you better be funny; or you better be the bully; or you better be wicked smart.  It sucks.  No one really wants to be fat.  It’s not fair, either, considering that the media alternative is anorexia.

Couldn’t the author of that letter addressing Ms. Livingston have been written to any of the emaciated female anchors or media stars serving at wretched examples to young girls?  Eating disorders are also epidemic.

The fat acceptance movement has gained some ground.  Some of its proponents state that being fat doesn’t necessarily mean you’re unhealthy.  That’s true.  But it’s also like suggesting that I leave one chamber empty into my Fat-Makes-Me-Sick-Gun and play Russian Roulette.

I’ve heard that being fat is an individual issue, and its “my business if I’m fat, not yours!”  Okay… well, in the words of my Kettle Bell Concepts II instructor, “You have a social responsibility NOT to be fat.  If there’s a fire in my office building and the elevators aren’t working, your fat body is probably what’s getting between me and the fire escape.”

Man, the comments can be harsh.  The truth hurts, especially when your condition is your responsibility.

The Yale Rudd Center submitted these guidelines in how to portray fat people in the media:

Guidelines

  • I: Respect Diversity and Avoid Stereotypes 
  • 1. Avoid portrayals of overweight and obese persons merely for the purpose of humor or ridicule.
  • 2. Avoid weight-based stereotypes (e.g., such as obese persons are “lazy” or “lacking in willpower”).
  • 3. Present overweight and obese persons in a diverse manner, including both women and men, of all ages, of different appearances and ethnic backgrounds, of different opinions and interests, and in a variety of roles.
  • 4. Portray overweight and obese individuals as persons who have professions, expertise, authority, and skills in a range of activities and settings.

By following some of these guidelines, don’t we inadvertently send the message that “It’s OK to be fat!”  That it is acceptable?  Isn’t that what the fat acceptance movement is all about?

Unacceptable!  Here is a neat little write-up of the economic costs of obesity.   Obesity accounts for 21 percent of health care costs.  Obesity, as far as the military is concerned (I wasn’t allowed into R.O.T.C.) is a national security threat.  Obesity contributes significantly to rising health care costs, how insurance policies are structured, time loss at work, sick days, ridiculous infrastructure modifications like larger seats in airplanes and restaurants, emergency medical responses, fertility complications, and more.

And we should just sit back and accept it because now everyone these days is fat?

Unlike being a minority, being young, old, gay, or handicapped, being fat is controllable.

Every bite that you take and every step that you make factors into your weight.  (A small percentage of a small percentage have weight issues related to genetic deviations, medications, and underlying disorders unrelated to initial body mass, and I respect that).

No one really wants to be fat.  And when a fat person wants to lose weight, one of the best things they can do is make it public–tell everyone they know what their goals are, surround themselves with people who also have healthy habits, and remove themselves from fat-promoting situations.  They should not seek solidarity with other fat people.  It’s like an alcoholic trying to quit drinking at a bar.

Now come on, Maria.  Alcoholism is an addiction.

What, and lifestyle isn’t defined by habits and addictions?  Changing your lifestyle–just about everything you do–is like quitting a substance.  It’s hard.

And so, back to Ms. Livingston… while I agree that her critic is kind of a D-bag and that fat kids and people shouldn’t be bullied or socially subdued, we should not accept fat, we should not falsely accuse someone of bullying just because the truth makes us feel bad.

6-Pack Abs Are Expensive

…unless you’re a teenage boy, or a hard-gainer.

The guy on the cover of Men’s Health Magazine is a professional model.  His job is to look good, and he doesn’t look that good by cutting back on carbs and doing crunches.

That guy probably pays money to look that good.  A lot of money.

I work in a body building gym in San Francisco.  It also just so happens to be San Francisco’s “gay gym.”  Sure, straight people are allowed in, but the member base is predominantly male.  You’re either a body builder, gay, or both.

It seems to me that body image is as important to this particular member base as it is for women!  Everywhere you look, there are tight, hard bodies pumping iron.  There’s the core group: the members who arrive every day, without fail, and work out for 2-3 hours.  Lift-pause-lift-pause-lift-pause.

…and then some “cardio:” slow, deliberate steps on the stair mill–forever.

I don’t know enough about body building to give an in-depth analysis, but what I can tell you is that these guys have the most expensive bodies of anyone I’ve ever known in a neighborhood gym.

  • $200 a month for supplements: protein powder, meal replacement, BCAAS, and more.
  • $100 a month for extra food: shakes, smoothies, and chicken.  Lots of chicken.  Insane amounts of chicken.
  • $0-$400 a month for personal training and accountability.
  • $80-$200 a month for body work, including stretching, massage, hair removal, and tanning.
  • $$$ = Time.  Tons of time exercising and eating.  Time planning meals.  Time commuting to and from the gym.  Time waiting between sets.  Having a solid body is one of the most time-intensive exercise goals of them all.  It’s like playing a sport, only your “practice” is 2-3x longer every day, and you have to invest 2-3x more time fretting about your food, and 2-3x more time recovering (every workout aims to demolish muscles; every workout aims to leave them twitching, dying, and torn at a microscopic level, in order to repair and grow bigger and stronger).  What is an hour of your time worth?

Don’t get me wrong.  I have tremendous respect for body builders.  It is a sport that requires insane precision and dedication.

But I’m weary on their behalf.  I’m weary for the time they spend fretting about whether one shoulder looks bigger than the other, about whether their kidneys are okay, whether they are coping with their body dysmorphia constructively.

Hey!  That’s just for body builders!  I don’t want to be a big massive guy.  I just want that 6-pack!

Take a ticket.  You and everyone else who doesn’t want an ounce of fat on them.  And there are two ways to get rid of every ounce of fat:

1) Just don’t eat.  Ever.  Give up food.

2) Don’t eat carbs.  Hyper-dose yourself on protein.  Stick with natural, unprocessed fats when needed, and lean protein the rest of the time.  Oh, and when you’re ready for your photo shoot, dehydrate yourself.

The body is designed to have a healthy layer of fat on it.  Your brain is wired to seek out fat and sugar.  When it ingests fat, it thinks, “Awesome!  Let’s eat more of that!”  When it finds sugar, it says, “Whoa! Cheap, delicious energy!”  When the two are combined, “Holy shit!  The is the most amazing food stuff I’ve ever encountered!”  It’s fat and carbs that the body wants.

Fat keeps the body feeling full longer than anything else, and it keeps the body running slowly.  Carbs are the body’s preferred energy source, and they allow for fast, rapid movement; they also make you feel happy.

The body does not have the same hard-wiring for protein.  Of course, protein is an essential macro-nutrient, but after you eat a sufficient amount, the brain says, “Boy, I don’t want another bite of chicken.  I’ll throw up.  I’m warning you…  No more!”

Eating massive amounts of protein is hard work.  And it’s hard work to digest as well.  You’re net energy decreases, and your organs work over-time.  It also requires a lot of water to digest.  If you aren’t getting sufficient fiber and vegetable intake, you run the short-term risk of constipation (uncomfortable) and the long-term risk of colon cancer (life threatening) and other types of cancer (if your protein is predominantly animal-sourced).

On the plus side: you will have very healthy hair and nails, and big muscles.

If you have a good ethic of regular exercise, including a variety of exercise activities, and you are fretting about your abs, know that for most people, 6-pack abs take an extreme level of dedication that may not be lifestyle friendly.

Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT): A Better Way To Manage Weight

I know I always say it: “Move more, eat less.”  I wrote it plainly and simply in a previous article, How To Lose Fat which, depressingly (though not surprisingly), topped the charts for the most-viewed article I’d written to date.

“Move more, eat less.”  Or consider my modified slogan: “Move more, eat well.”

Increase your total movement, not necessarily your exercise.  That’s what Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT) is all about.

After donning an expensive ($238) armband purported to track not only my heart rate, but also my calories burned, my steps, my physical activity, and my sleep patterns, I was shocked to see that my calorie burn sitting on the couch was indistinguishable from my calorie burn while sleeping.  I was more shocked to see that I actually burned more calories in an hour of ambling around the gym floor chatting up members than I did during my high intensity 30′ workoutfar more.

Seriously!?  What’s up with with this epidemic gym culture?  We’re told it’s diet and exercise, right?

Sure.  Exercise still has its place in terms of balancing hormones and neurotransmitters, posture, stamina, flexibility, and muscle mass–but in terms of weight management, it pales in comparison to NEAT.

NEAT represents the energy expenditure of daily activities such as standing, walking, moving, and shifting while sitting.  None of these are considered planned physical exercise.  They will make or break your weight loss goals.  Research by Levine et al. (2005) recruited 20 healthy volunteers of varying body masses  and tracked their movement over 10 days.  What they found was not surprising: obese subjects (half of the group) were seated on average 164 minutes longer than the leaner participants.  That’s two and a half hours!  Additionally, the lean participants were standing and moving for 153 minutes more per day than the obese subjects, and sleep times did not very at all between the groups.

The extra movement from the lean subjects averaged 352 +/- 65 calories per day, which is the equivalent of 36.5 pound of fat in one year.  All because they move around more.

Take home lesson: have an active lifestyle.  Find ways to inconvenience yourself.  Consider three rules to make and never break.

The following is a list of suggestions on how to be more active during the day (source: ACE Lifestyle & Weight Management Consultant Manual, 2nd Ed.):

  • Walk to work.
  • Walk during your lunch hour.
  • Walk instead of drive whenever you can.
  • Take a family walk after dinner.
  • Skate to work instead of driving.
  • Walking to your place of worship instead of driving.
  • Mow the lawn with a push mower.
  • Walk your dog.
  • Replace the Sunday drive with a Sunday walk.
  • Work and walk around the house.
  • Take your dog to a park.
  • Wash the car by hand.
  • Run or walk fast when doing errands.
  • Pace the sidelines at your kids’ athletic games.
  • Take the wheels off your luggage.
  • Walk to a coworker’s desk instead of emailing or calling.
  • Make time in your day for physical activity.
  • If you find it difficult to be active after work,  try to fit exercise in before work.
  • Take a walk break instead of a coffee break.
  • Perform gardening and/or easy-to-do home-repair activities.
  • Bring your groceries (from your car) into your house one bag at a time.
  • Play with your kids at least 30 minutes a day.
  • Dance to music.
  • Walk briskly in the mall.
  • Take the long way tot he water cooler or break room.
  • Take the stairs instead of the escalator.
  • Go for a hike.

STRESS: How It Affects Your Health

We’ve all heard it before.  Stress (and its associated hormone, cortisol) wears us down.  It lowers immunity.  It makes us unhappy, tired, angry.  It has us in a constant state of “survival mode.”  And it could very well be the source of all illness.

Let’s take a look inside the body for a minute.

The body is an amazing, intelligent machine.  It has healing powers rivaled by nothing in science or modern medicine.  Your body knows what it has to do, but is typically hindered stress and/or energetic imbalances.

In order to understand stress’ affect on the body, one must understand the autonomic nervous system, which breaks down into two types: the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS).  The PNS is responsible for the growth, healing, maintenance, and repair of bodily systems, without our being conscious of it.  For example, when you eat a carrot, you don’t think much more about it–how it is being handled in the stomach, passed through various parts of the digestive tract, and having its nutrition extracted and sent to appropriate places in the body.

The SNS is different.  Think of it as responsible for your “fight or flight” response; its like an alarm bell.  There’s a fire in an office building, and everyone panics, dashes about, and either tries to put out the fire, or gets away safely.  Normal office routines don’t continue.  Papers are not being filed, calls are not being made.

When the body is in fight or flight mode, things don’t run the same way.  Blood flow changes; there is less to the stomach for digestion, less to the kidneys and liver for cleansing, less to the frontal lobes of the brain for creative thought.  The majority of the blood is directed to parts of the body that need it the most, in order to save your life (or family, or house, or career).  Blood, its purity, its nutrient density, its concentration of red and white blood cells determines a major part of optimal health and functioning (and how efficiently blood is pumped, by a well trained heart and unobstructed arteries).

This redirection of resources, over a short term, is necessary for survival.  But over the long term–due to periods of constant stress–it is detrimental to health.  Lack of blood to the organs can ruin the immune system.  It doesn’t matter how many good things you put in; if you can’t make good use of them, they are wasted.  When the body is in fight or flight mode, cells don’t receive nutrition, sufficient oxygen, building blocks, etc.   The cells also don’t eliminate waste products.  Everything stops, except for what is necessary to “survive.”

Our fast-paced, high-tech, high-speed modern lifestyles are wearing on the health.  Much of technology, which is supposed to make our lives easier, is making them busier, more jam-packed, more stressful.  There are more things to worry about, more demands for performance, for our time.  That’s stressful!

The name of the game is stress management.  It’s about work-life balance.  It’s about taking time for yourself.  It’s about winding down.  Rest, relax, recover.

Allow your body to heal.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 48 other followers