“Sugar: The Bitter Truth,” from Robert H. Lustig, MD: A Summary

Dr. Robert H. Lustig begins with the question, “What do the Atkins diet and the Japanese diet have in common?”  It’s an odd question, as the two diets seem diametrically opposed.  The Atkins diet is all fat, no carb.  And the Japanese diet is all carb, no fat.  They both work.  So, what do they have in common?

They both eliminate the sugar fructose.

Lustig continues into a 90-minute lecture, called “Sugar: The Bitter Truth,” which can be viewed for free on Youtube.  Amazingly, this 90-minute talk on sugar and biochemistry was viewed by over 1.5 million people.  1.5 million people wanted to learn how fructose is basically the common denominator for virtually every aspect of Metabolic Syndrome.

Lustig begins with a basic law: if you eat it, you better burn it, or you’re going to store it.  This is the law of thermodynamics, pushed forward by fitness trainers and fad diets.  For many, it’s true.  Calories in vs. calories out will determine skinny or fat.

But it’s not true.  I’ve always said that if you eat 2,000 calories of protein vs. 2,000 calories of sugar, you will achieve a very different body shape.

Energy expenditure equals quality of life, Lustig continues.  The more energy you burn, the better you feel.  But we are not burning this energy, and America is suffering from an obesity epidemic.

There is a hormone in our body that tells us to stop eating.  It’s called leptin.  It’s supposed to tell us to stop eating, but Americans are eating more than ever, so clearly leptin isn’t working anymore.  There is something we are eating that is distorting our normal biochemical negative feedback system.

Is it the fat in our diet?

Nope, he says dismissively.  We’ve actually decreased our fat intake, as a country, from 40 to 30% over the past few decades.

It’s the carbs, Lustig declares.  There’s something in the carbohydrate we are eating that has shut down leptin.

Americans consume 65 lbs of high fructose corn syrup a year.  HFCS is much sweeter than most sugars.  The syrup is comprised of glucose and fructose (fructose will vary from 42-50%).  Sucrose (table sugar) is also a fructose and a glucose; table sugar is 50% glucose, 50% fructose.

Lustig declares, HFCS and sugar are the same.  They are both poison.  Sugar isn’t just about empty calories. Fructose is a poison, and it distorts your body’s chemistry.

Every single year, Americans not only eat more, but they eat more of their calories from sugar.

After summarizing how the Nixon administration would change the face of American food production and culture forever, and the tight correlation between soft drink consumption and obesity, Lustig asks his audience to hang on tight for a whirlwind tour of how glucose, fructose, and ethanol (alcohol) break down in the body.

Fructose is not glucose:

1. Fructose is 7 times more likely to form advanced glycation end products

2. Fructose does not suppress ghrelin (the hunger hormone) because it does not break down until it reaches the liver.

3. Fructose does not stimulate insulin or leptin.

4. Fructose is the only sugar metabolized by the liver.

5. It promotes metabolic syndrome.

Compare 2 slices of white bread (which is roughly 120 calories of glucose), to liquor (roughly 120 calories of ethanol), to a glass of a sugar-sweetened beverage (about 120 calories of sucrose, half of which is fructose).

The Bread (glucose) – 120 calories:

-80% of the glucose will be used by the body.

-About 20% of the glucose will hit the liver and get stored as glycogen (for future physical activity).

-A tiny fraction of the glucose will be made into ATP which, if not burned, will go through a number of biochemical processes, turning into citrate, and may be stored as fat.

-Perhaps 1/2 a calorie will end up as Pattern B Cholesterol (very low density lipoprotein), but it is negligible.  This is why you can live off white rice and not die of a heart attack.

The Alcohol (ethanol) – 120 calories:

- 24 calories will hit the kidneys, muscle, and brain.

-96 calories hit the liver.  This is four times the amount, compared to white bread (glucose).

-What hits the liver metabolizes into acetaldehyde (like formaldehyde), which is toxic.

- Like glucose, it breaks down into lots of citrate, and will be stored as fat (four times the amount!).

-The other by-product of this metabolic process is the production of Pattern B Cholesterol (VLDL), again, four times the amount.

The Sugary Beverage (sucrose) – 120 calories:

-60 calories from glucose will break down similarly to the white bread (48 calories to the body, 12 calories to the liver to be stored as glycogen).

-60 calories from fructose will all go to the liver.

-In total, 72 calories reaching the liver will need to be phosphoralated (turned into energy–ATP–adenosine tri phosphate).  That is a lot–three times the amount, when compared to white bread.

-You lose a lot of phosphate in this process, and so the body provides a rescue molecule, and the end waste product from the metabolism of these calories is uric acid (which causes gout and hypertension, among other things).

-Uric acid blocks the your body’s chemical–endothelial nitric oxide synthase–for maintaining low blood pressure.

-Citrate, again, arises from the metabolism of all these calories, which promotes fat retention, dyslipidemia, VLDL, and high blood triglycerides.

-In short, from any fructose load, 30% of it will end up as fat.

-An excess of body fat changes the way your body responds to leptin.  Leptin is a hormone produced by adipocytes (fat cells).  The more fat you have, the more leptin is produced to act on your brain’s hypothalamus.  But when there is too much, you develop leptin insensitivity; your brain can no longer recognize it and thinks you’re starving.  So you eat more.

A final comparison between soda and beer:

COKE BEER
Calories 150 150
Calories from fructose 75 (4.1 kcal/g) 0
Calories from other carbs 75 (glucose) 60 (maltose)
Calories from alcohol 0 90 (7kcal/g)
1st pass G.I. metabolism 0% 0%
Calories reaching the liver 90 92

Lustig says fructose is ethanol without the buzz.

Fructose is like drinking fat.  30% goes to fat storage.  It is metabolized like fat.

A high sugar diet is essentially a high fat diet.

The Most Atrocious Meal On The Menu

…at least, I thought it was atrocious.

I was thinking back to a few months ago, when I was travelling.  I’d given up sugar for three weeks.  At the end of three weeks, my travel partner and I thought it might be fun to christen a new form of American Gluttony: the Fast Food Crawl.

You’ve all heard of a pub crawl, right?  Buy a drink at every pub on the block… by the time you’re at the end, you’re off your tree.

Same concept, only with fast food restaurants in Sedona, Arizona.  We each ate one thing off the menu from Dairy Queen, Burger King, KFC, and McDonalds before I  tapped out, ready to puke–and cry!  (I later re-entered the game with a shame-eating session of candy, chips, and soda in the back of the pickup truck.)

At Burger King, I saw an advertisement for a burger that packed more than 1,000 calories in it.  One thousand calories?  In the burger alone?  Seriously!?  How can you fit that much energy into a burger?

Well, they did it.  I thought it was disgusting (as I plowed through my own baby version of that burger).  In fact, today I planned to dedicate an entire entry to it to that burger.  That is, until I found this: “The 4,301-calorie entree.”

I didn’t know how bad the ingenuity of American gluttony could be.  The fact that these things even exist–hell, that EATING ITSELF is a competitive “sport”–says a lot about our people.

War Is Responsible For An Obese America

War has been linked to just about everything.  The title of this article isn’t my thesis.  In fact, it came from an article by Shea Dean, “Children of the Corn Syrup: America’s Penchant For War Has Thrown Our Country Into An Orwellian Obesity Dystopia, And Fructose Is Big Brother.” (The Believer, October 2003).

The title itself was laugh-out-loud funny. Well, it is if you’re a geek like I am.  There are two things I love: dystopic stories and anything written about food policy.  And here Mr. Dean combined the two!  I had to read it.

The following is my summary of Mr. Dean’s article:

It is believed that we enter into wars with an eye toward oil, markets, or profits, but these reasons are too vague.  Wars are entered into for bodies–physical bodies that produce and consume products provided by a handful of umbrella companies.  Without health, there is no need for products; without food, there is no health.  Hence, when aid is provided to avert starvation, it is often a pretext to expand the market share of U.S. business.

Before World War II, farms used to be small.  Fields were sowed and reaped by people, or by small-scale machines.  Farmers were caretakers of the earth.  During the War, all that changed, and five million American farmers left to serve, leaving those remaining to pick up the slack.  Productivity was a must, as wars are fought with food.  Along with this incentive came revolutionary inventions from the military.

DDT, a chemical insecticide used to combat malaria overseas, made its way into the fields from cheap military surpluses.  Gunpowder and nitrate fertilizer share many of the same ingredients.  Aircraft was more available for crop-dusting.  After the war, few farmers returned to their land, enabling the others who had since based their business around these inputs to swipe it up and increase their holdings.  The bigger, the better.  The more inputs, the greater yield.

Then the issue of diminishing returns reared its head.  Suddenly a 500 percent increase in fertilizer only yielded 28 percent more corn.  Worse yet, the extra product on the market drove prices down, and smaller farmers were less and less able to afford their inputs with their tiny profit margins.

By 1971, as farmers were reaching their breaking point, Earl Butz was appointed Secretary of Agriculture.  Butz is infamous for his slogan, “Get big, or get out,” meaning, if a smaller farmer couldn’t handle it, then let the bigger guys take over.  Butz pressured foreign countries to lower tariffs, to allow American agricultural surpluses to flood their markets.  American farmers were told to plant “fencerow to fencerow,” convinced that sheer volume of product would open new markets.

Butz’ policies led to the worst soil erosion problems seen since the Dust Bowl.  By the end, only a tiny number of giant corporations that controlled most of the farmland were able to afford the machinery, the pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer to continue turning a profit.  But even they were at risk–and so the government stepped in with subsidies, that is, “corporate welfare.”  Suddenly, Americans could sell products cheaper than it cost to grow them!

Something still needed to be done with all that cheap corn, as opening foreign markets wasn’t enough.  It became feed for livestock, thereby driving down the price of a hamburger.  It became high fructose corn syrup, a miracle additive, which could be pumped into just about anything to make it sweeter, glossier, fresher-looking, longer-lasting. It also packs hidden calories, which makes for a fatter nation.  It gets shunted toward the liver for break-down.  The liver uses fructose to build triglycerides, which is associated with insulin resistance, that is, diabetes.

The problem?  Not self-control.  No.  It is sheer abundance.  Food is everywhere, laden with additives derived from cash crops.  It makes for a toxic food environment.  Everywhere you go, from your local grocery store to the vending machine, to the a gas station, to the doctor (free candy!), you find junk food.  As the food supply grew, so did American permissiveness.  The American College of Sports Medicine lowered its recommended exercise prescriptions; physical education programs in schools were waived or removed.  While pro-health and smart-diet campaigns are abundant enough, they pale in comparison to what food companies spend promoting their products.  Worse, the government does little to reverse the course of American health, lobbied by corporations ready to complain or cease funding the moment a policy cuts into their profits.

It’s a woeful situation.  Thanks to Earl Butz’ effect on international tariffs, other countries are no longer able to refuse American products.  It is impossible to compete with a country who can sell food cheaper than it costs to grow it.  Farmers can no longer support their families through their land, and are migrating to factory work (a whole new arena of exploitation).  When a nation can no longer afford to grow its own food, it loses its food sovereignty.  Today, agricultural workers enjoy debt to their companies, and high rates of cancer from overexposure to agricultural inputs; pickers do not enjoy even the most rudimentary labor rights or compensation plans.  Just as conflict diamonds garnered international attention, so should conventional food production.  It’s conflict food.  War food.

Here’s Why You Don’t Need Supplements!

One evening, while my client and I were digging through her kitchen cupboards, purging all the junk and processed food, she found a bottle of pills–some kind of supplement.  She asked, “Maria, should I keep these?”

It was a fair question.  After all, the health and fitness industry–a 60-billion-dollar a year industry–promotes supplements, multi-vitamins, herbal teas, fat blasters, bars, shakes, powders, and hocus pocus very heavily in an attempt to brainwash you into thinking you need products to remain alive.  My client (see testimonial, Jane Perneel) had spent a fair sum on this supplement, I’m sure, and probably didn’t want it to go to waste.

Without looking at the bottle, I asked, “Are you prepared to buy and swallow that product for the rest of your life.”

She blinked.  “No.”

“Then throw it out.”

And that, dear readers, is the Golden Rule for lifestyle change.

I could end the article here, but let’s dig a little further, if you didn’t understand the lesson.  Mankind has been on this earth for millions of years without supplements.  He worked, he moved, he ate; he created art, music, culture, politics, philosophy, business, communities, families.  He procreated without a problem.

Supplements don’t make you smarter, healthier, skinnier, or more vital.  Physical activity and a nutritious diet do.  And they keep you that way.

Oh, but what about needing a multi-vitamin/pill to fill the holes in/reverse the consequences of my diet? Stop eating so poorly!  If you can’t look at yourself in the mirror and accept that a desired change must come from you and not a pill, then you don’t deserve it.

At the risk of sounding too harsh, I will be the first to admit that American culture, with its capitalist hegemony and institutions makes it exceedingly difficult–if not impossible–for some individuals and communities to affect change in their lives, especially in their health.  That is why I write this blog–to educate, to inspire, and ultimately to help people who need health the most.

Remember, 60 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!  That’s how gargantuan, fake, excessive, and confusing the health and fitness industry is.  If you have been brainwashed into thinking you need anything besides physical activity and good nutrition, I can understand why.

Pills do not change you from the inside-out.  Only your autonomy can.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers