The Shake Weight

One of my clients sent me an article regarding this, the Shake Weight, and asked me my thoughts.  Was it a waste of time?

I often say there are no wrong exercises (there are unsafe ones, which might make them “wrong”), but there certainly are inefficient ones.

So what’s the deal with this Shake Weight, suddenly popular among women due to it’s sleek and light (2.5 lbs!) design.  Women have been looking for a way to “tone up” their bodies without breaking into the realm heavy weights, or man-infested weight rooms (although the Shake Weight is trying to grab a male demographic). But what is “toning up,” really?  It means lowering ones body fat percentage, so that underlying muscle is more visible.  To do that, you need to burn fat and create a caloric deficit.

Vibrating technology is not new.  Anything that makes you shake and shimmy is “harder” than traditional exercises.  Whenever something is placed under more tension, it has to work harder.  There are vibrating platforms, squishy pads, Bosu balls, and hydro-fit-”technology” you shake yourself.  But what’s the point, really, if all you want to do is tone up and feel the burn?

I would say the Shake Weight isn’t so much a waste of time, as everything new can confer initial strength, fitness, or body composition changes.  I will, however, say that it is a waste of money.  Twenty bucks for something that weighs a mere 2.5 lbs that you will adapt to in a week, maybe two.  Then what? You’ve got this piece of crap littering your house.

In just 6 minutes a day, you can get results!  You’ll feel a burn, guaranteed!

You know what else?  6 minutes of push-ups will sculpt your arms, and in far less time than six minutes.  Plus they are free, and you don’t  have to pack them when you travel.

Vibration technology has its purposes.  I can imagine downhill skiers might find a vibrating platform functional for their sport.  A co-worker of mine made some very critical remarks about the Bosu ball being an unsafe waste of time, but the Bosu’s instability and shaking resonated with the former rowing athlete in me, much accustomed to the unbalanced conditions of boats.

Before you drop twenty dollars to get your teeny weeny shaking weight (plus your “$15-value” burned DVD, which we know is NOT worth $15), ask yourself how it will actually contribute to your fitness.

Why Alcohol Makes You Chubby: And How It Sabotages Weight Loss Goals

Beer belly.  Why not beer body?

It’s interesting how alcohol tends to go right to the tummy.  Okay, it’s true that alcohol goes other places, too, over time; but the nice thing about beer weight is that it can come off about as quickly as it came on, unlike other fat.  All you have to do it change your habits.

Allow me to explain why cutting out alcohol will yield an almost immediate shift in body fat; this information supports my observations of my clients’ (and my own) body compositions when alcohol was given up for at least two weeks.

There are three macronutrients with which we are all familiar: protein, carbohydrate, and fat, (some people include a fourth, water).  Each gram of protein and carbohydrate yields 4 calories; each gram of fat yields 9 calories.  Alcohol, it’s own entity, yields 7 calories. But alcohol isn’t a nutrient, as it generally kills everything with which it comes into contact.  A nutritionist who worked at the ARCO Olympic Training center once said to me during my stay, “I can’t think of one good reason why an elite athlete should ever consume alcohol.” It hinders your other metabolic pathways, and it destroys.  It dehydrates, and it slows you down.

Okay, great.  But who cares?  Most people aren’t training for the Olympics.  Booze is awesome in other rites, and can provide emotional (arguable) and social benefits.  Alcohol, after coffee, is the second most abused mood-altering substance, and some version of an alcoholic beverage has infiltrated just about every human culture.  It’s popular, it’s accessible, and it is sanctioned by society.  It relaxes and relieves stress for people who are probably more stressed now than ever before.  No wonder many of my clients are so unwilling to quit drinking, even for a little while!

“I don’t really drink that much.  Maybe 2 to 4 drinks in a week.”  Okay, let’s break that down.

A glass of wine has 100 calories.  That’s a four-ounce glass.  That’s 1/2 cup.  Find your teeny weeny measuring cup in your kitchen drawer.  That’s 100 calories! I cannot remember the last time I ever poured myself, or had someone else pour, only four little ounces.  More like 6.

A beer might pack at least 120 calories (unless it’s some awful light beer, which is closer to 100).  Most have 140 up to 200.

An ounce of spirits will pack 80, but few people drink liquor straight; some kind of sugary mixer comes with it.

Let’s crunch some numbers.  You’re a light drinker, and keep your habit to the weekend, over dinner.  You drink 3 six-ounce glasses of wine over your weekend.  That’s 450 calories (people often fail to count the calories they consume through beverages, and they also do a poorer job of compensating for liquid calories later). That 450 calories is an entire workout! That would be 1/5 of your week’s effort down your throat, and if your goal is to lose 1-lb per week, that is 1/7 of a pound.

Okay, big deal.  You made sure you had enough space left over for the booze.

So PAY ATTENTION HERE.  Alcohol, once ingested, breaks down into two compounds: fat and acetate.  The fat will go into storage, and the acetate will be burned as fuel.  The body, which had been slowly and steadily burning fat while you were at rest (and if you are working hard at the gym, you were enjoying your sweet “after-burn” of fat metabolization), slams down the E-brake on fat burning and starts burning the acetate instead.  You literally put a halt (or at least significantly slowed, up to 75%) to your fat burning metabolism; not only that, the fat derived from alchol went right into your storage!

Alcohol also is an appetite stimulant (ever heard of an aperitif?).  Drinking before or during dinner makes you want to eat more.  It also makes you care less about how much you are eating (irresponsible eating).  Calories sneak in, and because your body is busy metabolizing the acetate, sit back and let the other nutrients entering your blood stream get shunted into storage. One drink can stunt your fat metabolization for several hours. That sucks, especially when you are winding down at night, and your metabolism is already running a little slower.  The idea behind exercise is it raise your rate of fat metabolization.

Alcohol dehydrates.  Water is an essential nutrient, and it is involved in countless catalytic processes within your body.  One of these is the metabolization of fat.  Another is muscle building.  Few people make sure to drink a glass of water for every glass of booze they consume.  Dehydrating your body even a little bit slows down your fitness goals!

Finally, alcohol raises cortisol, your stress hormone that encourages the retention of fat.  It also hinders testosterone production, the “skinny” hormone generally produced in higher quantities after interval and strength training.

So let’s summarize:

1) Alcohol has lots of calories.

2) It increases fat storage, and halts fat metabolization.

3) It tends to make you eat and drink more.

4) It dehydrates you.

5) It produces more “fat” hormones, and hinders to production of “skinny” hormones.

…Stop drinking alcohol, and there will be less to retard your body’s fat metabolization.

Ready to give it up for a while?

Re-defining Normal

Reading a book on synthetic chemicals in our environment, I came across a line that stuck me as profoundly true and cynical.  It was something to the effect of, “When we don’t like something, we simply re-define what is normal.”

If it’s “normal,” we don’t have to confront it.  Let’s take average body fat, or body weight, or blood pressure.  In modern societies, the averages for all these categories are staggeringly high when compared to the numbers registered in historic and modern hunter-gatherer societies, who ate clean organic wild food, and spent much of their time moving.

120/80 is an average and normal blood pressure for someone in a modern society.  We have erroneously concluded that it’s a sign of health.  Why, when the average blood pressure among hunter-gatherers is a full 20 points lower in both systolic and diastolic readings?! (See The Paleo Diet For Athletes, Loren Cordain, PhD and Joe Friel, MS).  I call that significant.

How can we think our bodies and health are normal?  Normal compared to what?  We’re too afraid to confront our health.  Adaptation to an unhealthy environment is not a sign of health; it is a sign of sickness.

Training Your Metabolic Pathways (part 1)

Here’s a crash course in exercise physiology.

Whatever you eat, and however you exercise, your body ultimately gets its energy from a molecule called ATP, which stands for adenosine tri-phosphate. Imagine a little three-leaf clover; each leaf is a phosphate.  Your body pops one of these leaves and energy is released, rendering that clover a di-phosphate (only two phosphates are left).  Your metabolism looks around for something to replace that third leaf.

You may think that you get energy from calories–”fuel”–and that you burn whatever goes in when you’re exercising.  While this is true in a broad sense, it is far more complicated than that.  The metabolism (the rate/way in which you burn energy) is a very sophisticated and complex thing.  It is dynamic, and it has different strengths and weaknesses, depending on who you are; it can also be trained and adapted, just like your body.

There are four metabolic pathways for energy production:  aerobic liposis, aerobic glycosis, anaerobic glycosis, and ATP-CP. Depending on your demand for energy, your metabolism will select one or two metabolic pathways.

When your body is looking for ATP, it can derive it from different complex chemical processes (pathways).  The first and most basic of these is aerobic liposis.  (Liposis>lipid>”fat”).  Your metabolism finds free fatty acids circulating in your blood, combines it with oxygen, and can convert it into energy. This process, however, is complicated and time-consuming, and will not suffice when the body has a high energy demand.  Hence, aerobic liposis is used during non-exercise (that is, day-to-day life and activities), and very low intensity exercise (your heart rate can be elevated only a little bit).

The next pathway is aerobic glycocsis.  (Glycosis>glycogen>glucose>”sugar”).  Glycogen is sugar stored in your muscles and a few of your organs, and the average person can store about 1,500-2,000 calories of glycogen.  Glycogen is combined with oxygen to derive ATP.  You can think of glycogen as your fuel; and your muscles and organs, as your fuel tank. When exercising, your body depletes this fuel.  After exercising, you must eat (carbohydrates) to re-fill the tank.

The third pathway, anaerobic glycosis, generates ATP without the use of oxygen.  You can imagine red-lining your car, ripping through your fuel reserves, and smelling something hot and dirty from your vehicle’s effort.  The amount of glycogen needed for this effort is significantly higher, but because oxygen cannot be utilized, you get a nasty, burning by-product called lactic acid.  Lactic acid is what makes exercise burn; the effort from this kind of exercise can significantly wear down muscle tissue (this is not necessarily a bad thing).  At home, you’re exhausted, your body is humming, and you are hungry.  This “afterburn” from exercise is when weight loss and body re-composition happy. Your body scrambles around, looking for something to convert into glycogen (whatever carbohydrates you eat), and also goes around building and re-arranging proteins, to make your lean tissues bigger and stronger–more prepared, in case it ever has to do that exercise again!

The final pathway, ATP-CP, provides the most explosive energy to your body.  ATP stands for adenosine tri-phosphate. CP stands for creatine phosphagen. Basically, when that third leaf on the clover pops (ATP turns into ADP), the body goes immediately to rob that “P” from CP, to rebuild ADP to ATP.  Unfortunately, the body has extremely limited amounts of CP.  Energy from this system is provided for seconds only.

So, how can you train these systems?

Aerobic glycosis is any sustainable activity lasting anywhere from 20-90 minutes.  Even longer, if you are a seasoned endurance athlete. This system is trained by exercise like running, rowing, swimming, or general bodyweight and resistance exercises with high repetitions.

Anaerobic glycosis is a much less sustainable activity, that can last minutes only.  This can be anything from strength training (8,10, 12 repetitions) to intervals, to Fartlek training, Tabata intervals, to sprinting, to jumping.  Each effort is full tilt,and recovery time between efforts is ample.

The ATP-CP system provides energy for merely seconds.  Explosive and full-body recruitment exercises train this system.  Examples include some plyometrics, max-out lifting, 10 second sprints/intervals, throwing, etc.

**Note: seldom is the body ever exclusively in one pathway or anotherIn fact, the body has a tendency to blend them.  For example, at rest, the body taps into its aerobic lipolitic (fat burning system), but might rely on the aerobic glycolitic system for up to 30% of its energy needs as well.  A multi-step full out effort, such as a Turkish get-up, might switch between ATP-CP and anaerobic glycosis.  Endurance lifting will certainly spread over aerobic and anaerobic glycosis.

Each system can be trained and adapted.  The more endurance activities you do, for example, the more you will be able to do later.  By keeping your body on a bobble between aerobic and anaerobic intensities, you eventually condition your body to accept more work (hence, you become more fit).

How?  One way is by increasing the number of mitochondria in your muscles.  Mitochondria are basically the “lungs” of your cells, and accept more oxygen.  The more oxygen your muscles can accept, the more energy they can deliver towards an effort.  This is one reason why it is important not to do the same exercise all the time, as your body becomes more and more efficient.  To make gains in fitness, you must always seek new ways to challenge yourself.

To be continued…

Crappy Crunches: Stop Wasting Your Time

If there’s one thing that annoys me at the gym (there aren’t that many things that annoy me at the gym; believe it or not, I’m very tolerant, and I can see the good in just about everything), it’s people doing crunches.  Crunches, crunches, crunches.

“I want six-pack abs!”  Well, believe me, buddy.  Doing those wimpy crunches won’t get you anywhere near a six-pack.

“I was told sit-ups are bad for you.”  Bad for you?  Really?  The ability to sit up is bad?  Okay… then roll onto your hip and get up from all-fours for the rest of your life.

Doing any exercise incorrectly can be unsafe.  Your form may be bad, not the exercise.

So what’s the story with crunches?  Why did they become so popular?

People started lacing their fingers behind their heads and straining to sit up.  Their lower lumbar spine, probably unaccustomed to the exercise, tended to curl and compress their discs.  Their elbows pointed forward, their eyes were squeezed shut, and their necks were feeling strained from the effort.  This is not a good position for the spine, in any sense.  High quality sit-ups aren’t easy.  Twenty years ago, it was decided that crunches were a nicer option, because they were “easier” on the spine (and they could be easily integrated into aerobics exercise videos, which were very popular at the time).

Let’s face it.  America is getting lazier and lazier.  Over the past 30 years, the American Council of Sports Medicine (ACSM) has lowered it’s exercise recommendations.  Why?  Because an out-of-shape American would feel too daunted by the amount of exercise formerly prescribed.  The idea was to encourage people to start exercising (period) by telling them it wouldn’t have to be that much.

Crunches are easy. I don’t care who you are.  They are easy, and that is why people gravitate toward them (like elliptical machines), especially when they’ve been led to believe that sit-ups are “bad for you.”  You do a few crunches, and within seconds you start to feel that burn in your upper abs.  Awesome!  You’re giving yourself a great core workout!  Right?

Wrong.  The only part of your core getting worked is the upper region of the rectus abdominis, a relatively tiny portion of your core.

Core strength is something far more complex than mere isolation exercises.  Every time you lift a box, walk, run, jump, twist, sit-up and get out of bed, load the dishwasher, vacuum your house, pick up your kid, whatever–you are using your core.  Your core strength will dictate your posture.  It is involved in just about every functional movement there is.

Crunches?  Come on! You think it’s going to give you definition?  Low body fat will give you muscle definition.  Low body fat is achieved by burning body fat–burning excess calories.

You can lower body fat by building muscle, so can’t you build muscle doing crunches?  Sure, and give yourself years to get there.  Or, you can do sit-ups properly.  You can do leg lifts, too.  Switch to compound exercises like the dead lift, build way more muscle, burn way more fat, and get your results.

What else works the core?  Push-ups and pull-ups (these will target the same muscles your crunches will), big time.  Holding weight at chest height and doing squats.  Torso twists.  The list goes on.

Look on the web if you want to find pro-crunch articles.  But you will never ever, ever see me prescribe a crunch on this site.  On my list of “core exercises to do,” they fall right at the bottom.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers