Problems With Paleo & Low-Carb Diets

This is the Paleo article I didn’t want to write.

No wait.  I take that back.  I desperately wanted to write it, because the Paleo obsession with meat and its attack on starch drove me up the wall.  But at the end of the day, I couldn’t stay angry at the Paleo Diet.  Though the original popularization of Paleo was aggressively put forth by Dr. Loren Cordain with a meat pyramid that made my environmentalist-anti-industrial-meat-production sensibilities shudder in horror, many of the spin-offs of the Paleo movement have a much more docile message: don’t process your food.

Simple.

Oh yeah, and don’t eat refined “fast-carbs,” as I like to call them (i.e., fine flour products, sugars, syrups, extracts, alcohol).

That’s easy.  And that sounds just like every other sensible diet that works.

But what kills me is the Paleo avoidance of whole food starches like whole grains, bean, legumes, and potatoes.  What gives?

If you had given me sixty seconds to say it all, I would have sucked up a bunch of air like Ace Ventura and proceeded rapidly with something like this:

  • Carbs are essential for performance, especially for endurance.
  • Our anatomy far more resembles than of an herbivore than it does that of a carnivore.  In light of this, as omnivores, it makes more sense to lean toward the herbivore end of the food spectrum.
  • Carbs are overwhelmingly abundant in nature compared to fats and proteins, though marginalized terrains don’t offer enough of the carbs we can actually eat, and therefore lead us to rely more heavily on animal-sourced calories.
  • Carbs have a unique ability to make us fat if we eat too many of them; this would actually be an evolutionary advantage, especially with fructose consumption. Interestingly, it is nearly impossible to become fat on a high whole carb diet if fat intake is limited.
  • Carbs regulate serotonin and digestive contraction.
  • Carbs mostly break down into glucose, which is our preferred energy source; glucose metabolism is the oldest form of energy metabolism identified.
  • The Paleo movement is egocentric, especially for men; any diet that makes us feel more manly, more aggressive, and more dominant over our environment (read: top of the food chain) would clearly gain favor, as demonstrated by the Crossfit movement.
  • Crossfit, a popular and generally-looked-down-upon, dangerous and poorly-implemented fitness fad (at least from my surveys of other exercise physiologists–I’ll save this critique for another article) promotes a style and intensity of fitness appropriate to the limitations of a low-carb diet.  Metabolic conditioning workouts lasting 5-20 minutes do not draw heavily on glycogen stores.
  • Re: Crossfit and its Paleo appeal to functional training – I can’t think of any circumstance in which a paleolithic human would ever need to perform a true Olympic lift, or could actually handle such weights in their natural, awkward, unbalanced forms (logs, rocks, etc.).  Olympic lifting, at least, requires considerable and impressive technique; power lifting, also a mainstay of Crossfit, is less technical and certainly another ego-driven endeavor.  It comes as no surprise to me that meat-eating and Crossfit are happily married.
  • High protein, low-carb diets are not only dehydrating, they require much more intensive digestive and metabolic effort, and the net energy gained from such diets is poor.  While this is helpful to a sedentary fat person who wants to lose weight without working out, it is not beneficial to people who must move all day.
  • Blood samples from plant-based meals are cleaner and less cloudy than those from animal-based meals; this, too, should have implications on cardiovascular efficiency.
  • High meat consumption–especially red meat–is acidifying and overly “yang.”  This can be no better than a “yin” dominated diet of refined foods, alcohols, and stimulants.  The name of the game is balance, and Paleo is nothing more than a re-packaged Atkins diet with marginal flexibility around fruits and vegetables (as long as they don’t grow underground).
  • Intermittent fasting packaged as “replicating” paleo life is a joke.  This is nothing more than promoters establishing–through their dietary protocols–a guarantee to deplete glycogen stores (the first to go during a fast) so that you must always be in a state of gluconeogenesis (a metabolic pathway that results in the generation of glucose from non-carbohydrate sources).
  • Paleo Diet is nothing more than a fad diet book that makes impatient, lazy people happy with a scientifically proven (thanks to the attention drawn from the Atkins movement) failsafe way to burn fat.
  • The Paleo Diet’s environmental impact (if applied on a large scale) is nothing short of a suicide mission for the environment, considering our capacity for land animals.
  • The Paleo Diet completely ignores less glamorous aspects of paleolithic life: namely, consumption of insects, parasitic infection rates and their inhibition of autoimmune disorders and allergies, and the inevitable consumption of feces and dirt.
  • The Paleo Diet unfairly names protein and fat consumption as being responsible for encephalation (increase brain size) in relation to a decrease in the size of the gut.  It is far more likely that encephalation resulted from the implementation of cooking food, thereby reducing its mass, “pre-digesting” it, creating greater bio-availability of its nutrients, and increasing net energy after digestive effort.
  • The Paleo Diet claims that agrarian life led to shorter, weaker, sicker humans.  This is unfounded.  The evidence points in all directions; many agrarian peoples fared better than hunter-gatherer groups; the inverse is also true.  Ultimately, height and strength is a factor of nutrition, parasitic load, and physical activity more than it is a factor of meat consumption.
  • Meat and animal sources of protein are high in certain amino acids which are strongly linked to cancer growth (i.e., methionine).
  • The Paleo Diet denies (or at least tries to ignore) the well-established lipid hypothesis, which has established the link between cholesterol and heart disease.  Saturated fat, a mainstay in the paleo diet, is strongly associated with increased LDL (bad) cholesterol.  (Learn more about lipids in this reader-friendly article.)
  • Bad breath is usually a sign of a health imbalance.  Bad breath is a common sign of ketosis, which is a desired effect of low-carb diets.  Constipation is also strongly correlated with high protein consumption.

This was just my superficial rant.

I’ll stop here.  I won’t dig any deeper, because Plant Positive does it so much better, and I’d much rather give homage to his thorough, well-reasoned, calm discussion of scientific research he uncovered.

It you are serious about your health–I mean, if you really are on a mission to avoid all the bad diseases of affluence and live a long, energetic life–then I DARE you to take the time to watch the entire PRIMITIVE NUTRITION series by Plant Positive.

Budget about 9 1/2 hours.

Diets Containing 10-20% HFCS / Sugar don’t prevent weight loss.

This was a fun read.

A study published recently (August, 2012) in Nutrition Journal called “The effects of four hypocaloric diets containing different levels of sucrose or high fructose corn syrup on weight loss and related parameters” made some conclusions about sugar consumption and weight loss.

If you don’t know what “hypocaloric” means, it means “low-calorie.”  The study took different groups of overweight-to-obese people and placed them on diets containing levels of sugar (sucrose) or HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) in levels of 10-20% of their total caloric intake, and ensured that all groups achieved a caloric deficit of about 300 calories per day.  Every group, including the control group, was also put on an exercise program.

And what happened?

Short answer: everyone lost body fat.

Yippie!

I didn’t need to read the article to know that would happen.  Come on.  That’s just Personal Training 101: calories in vs. calories out–plus the bonus of thermogenetic exercise!  Every trainer is taught to sell training on that concept.  Burn more than you eat and you lose weight.

“What are you getting at?” you ask.

Well… this isn’t new research.  It’s old.  Super old.  We didn’t need a controlled double-blind study to prove it.  Trainers see it every day.  Anyone who had ever deliberately lost weight by counting calories know this.

But if you dig deeper and look at the underlying biochemistry of sugar metabolism, it still isn’t news.  No one explains it better than Dr. Robert H. Lustig.  Sucrose and HFCS are almost identical in composition, and in how they behave in the body.

To be completely fair, HFCS got a very bad reputation for a while.  People failed to see that it was pretty much the same as regular table sugar.

The scientists, in an effort to save the reputation of added sweeteners, state:

evidence regarding a potential positive association between sugar sweetened beverage consumption and obesity is inconsistent [43]. Because of the metabolic nature of overweight and obesity and the complexity of the western diet, it is unlikely that a single food or food group is the  primary cause. Randomized, clinical feeding trials have shown inconsistent results from testing the effects of added sugar on weight gain. Differences in study instruments and methods, population studied and study design may have contributed to these inconsistent findings.

In other words, science has a very tough time pinning down cause and effect in multi-variable situations.  It can’t really.  ”Causation” is exceedingly difficult to prove.  But correlations are easy to demonstrate.  Too easy, sometimes.  This is why social context, politics, policy, money, corruption, public opinion, advertising, and everything else should always be factored into the decision-making process.  Emotional intuitive (visceral) decisions shouldn’t be overlooked, either.  Yes, these things get us into trouble, but so does science.

My favorite quote these days is “100% of all products recalled by the FDA were deemed ‘safe and effective’ by the FDA.”  Science can be bullshit.  ”Good science” is much rarer in our industry-led scientific data pool.

I have absolutely no argument with what the study concluded:

“In conclusion, similar decreases in weight and indices of adiposity are observed when overweight or obese individuals are subjected to hypocaloric diets with different prescribed levels of sucrose or high fructose corn syrup.”  < (AND EXERCISE, you jerks!  You left that out!)

At the bottom, I looked for conflicts of interest.  Here’s what it said: “JM Rippe has received research funding from the Corn Refiners Association for the present study. The other study authors reported no competing interests.”

Ok… one guy.  Big deal.  And there were how many scientists?

Here they are:

Joshua Lowndes (jlowndes@rippelifestyle.com})
Diana Kawiecki (Dkawiecki@rippelifestyle.com})
Sabrina Pardo (Spardo@rippelifestyle.com})
Von Nguyen (Vnguyen@rippelifestyle.com})
Kathleen J Melanson (kmelanson@uri.edu})
Zhiping Yu (Zyu@rippelifestyle.com})
James M Rippe (Jrippe@rippelifestyle.com})

Wow!  They all WORK FOR Mr. James M. Rippe!  No conflict of interest, you say?  That’s sweet.

The CORN REFINERS ASSOCIATION paid Mr. Rippe and his associates (or employees) to design a study that teaches us nothing new at all, to make HFCS look less hazardous than it is.  I had such a giggle over this I thought I’d point it out to my readers.

HFCS and Sugar consumption at levels of 10-20% of a low-calorie (plus exercise) diet don’t inhibit weight loss when efforts are well-structured and executed.  The introduction of HFCS didn’t make us fat, they’d like us to think.  Well let me say this: the correlations are staggering.

Correlations are neat little things that help us make general decisions.  Correlations should be taken with other correlations and perhaps a dose of intuition.  This ads up to lifestyle change.

So keep in mind that the Corn Refiner’s Association is a lobbying group whose sole purpose is to make the public and politicians feel all warm and fuzzy about corn.

Corn. King corn.  The CORNerstone of farm policy.  The crop that receives the most subsidies (i.e. ‘welfare’).  The crop around which our backward policies have enabled the competitive wipe-out of other corn producers.  The crop around which so much GMO attention and research is hinging.  The crop that is quite impossibly being directed towards “sustainable energy.”

Good old corn, you complicated SOB.  I’m so glad these scientists devoted their valuable skills to the promotion of bastardized food production and processing.

Your Hormones: How They Affect Your Weight (part 5: Testosterone)

Hormones are powerful things; they affect everything.  Different hormones, of course, directly affect different things. Here’s what you need to know about testosterone.

Testosterone, popularly known as the male sex hormone, is present in both men and women (but in amounts averaging ten times higher in men) as an anabolic (promoting growth) steroid hormone.  In men, it is made in large amounts in the testicles; in women, it is made in smaller amounts in the ovaries; and in both men and women, small amounts in the adrenal glands.

Roles:

Testosterone is essential for the development of male reproductive tissues, but has many secondary roles in both men and women: it helps build muscle, burn fat, boost energy, increase strength, increase bone density, lift depression, increase sex drive, and more.  In women, higher levels of testosterone are associated with higher levels of assertiveness.

Testosterone can affect fat metabolism:

Testosterone is a muscle building hormone, and muscle helps you burn more calories at rest, while also giving the body a tighter, more compact shape.

Testosterone blocks the effects of lipoprotein lipase, an enzyme that enables the body’s fat cells to store fat.  Testosterone also increases fat metabolism by increasing certain key receptors on the fat cell-membrane to release fat.  (See article)  Through this mechanism, testosterone also increases insulin sensitivity.

*One study suggests that weight loss makes fat men more masculine by preserving testosterone; fat cells synthesize the enzyme aromatase which converts testosterone, the male sex hormone, into estradiol, the female sex hormone (estogen); a decrease in fat cells would lead to a decrease in the synthesis of aromatase, responsible for this phenomenon.

Things that affect testosterone levels in both sexes:

Aging lowers levels of testosterone, along with other factors such as poor diet, alcohol consumption, smoking, caffeine, excess body fat, and stress.  It has been suggested that inadequate levels of Vitamin D are associated with decreased levels of testosterone in men.

A nutritious diet, especially one rich in vitamin A, zinc, magnesium, and B6, healthy omega-3s (fish oil, chia seed), and especially amino acids (the building blocks of protein) will promote testosterone production. This is accomplished by eating a variety of fresh vegetables, complete proteins, and healthy fats in the form of nuts, seeds, and olive oil.  Watching fat intake is key, as the Standard American high-fat Diet lowers testosterone levels.  When seeking complete proteins, watch fat content, as animal-based saturated fats tend to be stored (as fat*, see above), whereas monounsaturated fats (nuts, olives, avocado) and polyunsaturated fats (omega 3s) are used preferentially for fuel.

The incorporation of resistance training–weight bearing exercise–into your fitness program is essential for increasing levels of this slimming hormone.  Compound exercises are better than isolated exercises, as they recruit more muscle fibers.  Lifting heavier encourages more testosterone production that high-rep, light-weight endurance lifting.

Brain Chemistry and Hunger: What’s Making You Want To Eat?

Gluttony is a plague on Western society.

…But this isn’t exactly news.  We all know the “SAD” diet (Standard American Diet) is a disgraceful binge on saturated fat, trans fat, high-glycemic carbohydrates, refined and de-natured foods.  This is a recipe for fat bodies and poor health.

Oh, yes, and there’s plenty of advice about how to eat less. You’ve heard it before:

Chew your food thoroughly.  Don’t eat in front of the TV.  Avoid high GI foods that trigger cravings.  Chug a glass of water before your meals.  Avoid “grazing.”  Don’t dine out so often.  Give yourself “small allowances,” but stick to your plan!  Give it time, your stomach will “shrink” and you’ll feel more full on less food.

Blah!  Blah!  Blah!

This helps a few, but I’m interested in knowing why, when I try to re-duce my own calorie consumption (even modestly), it feels like some kind of switch has been flipped, and my brain screams, “Eat, dammit!  Eat everything you can find!”

Hunger is an extremely complex subject–too vast to cover in a single article.  But I would like to address the aforementioned “switch.”  The chemistry behind it…

Hunger and Brain Chemistry

Everything boils down to chemistry.  Your emotions, your metabolism, physiology.  Your relationship with food is one of chemistry.

1) Serotonin: The happy neurotransmitter!  It regulates mood, sleep, muscle contraction.  You know what else?  Hunger! It suppresses it.  Most of your serotonin is located in your GI tract, where it regulates intestinal movement.  This chemical is released when you eat carbohydrates.

Your overall diet has the greatest influence of your level of serotonin.  The amino acid tryptophan is the building block of serotonin, but ingested through protein-rich food, tryptophan has a hard time making it past the blood brain barrier, due to competition with other amino acids.  When carboyhdrates are consumed, thereby raising blood sugar and insulin release, those competing amino acids get directed to the muscles, leaving tryptophan free to do its work in promoting serotonin.

2) Dopamine, Norepinephrine: These neurotransmitters influence your level of alertness, which includes your ability to concentrate and your reaction times. Your body produces more dopamine and norepinephrine when you eat protein-rich foods. Proteins are chains of amino acids, and the relevant amino acid here is tyrosine.

That’s nice to know, but what’s it all mean?  Dopamine is an extremely powerful neurotransmitter, associated with all kinds of mood disorders and addictive behaviors.  It’s the “reward” chemical.  Your diet-related addiction to dopamine can have a severe impact on your eating patters–particularly in matters pertaining to hunger vs. satisfaction!

Hunger is physiology; satisfaction is psychology.

We love dopamine.  There’s no way around it.  And we love foods that contribute to our levels of dopamine.  Unfortunately, eating lots of protein-rich foods (filling you up temporarily) actually inhibits your gains in serotonin (the appetite-suppressing chemical). The body has a very difficult time deciding whether to digest carbohydrates or proteins, because these different foodstuffs require different PH balances in the stomach.

Ahh, but combine protein and carbohydrates (ice cream, anyone?) and you have a nuclear weapon against your brain. On the one hand, the serotonin derived from the sugar will give you a life, and on the other hand, the opioid behavior from the dairy protein with sedate you wonderfully.

3) Ghrelin: This is the only known “hunger hormone.”  It is extremely persuasive.  In fact, it is more persuasive that any of your satiety hormones.  Ghrelin is produced when the stomach is empty.  It says, “Fill me!”  Individuals who have had gastric bypass surgery end up with lower levels of ghrelin, because the surgery reduces the amount of ghrelin-producing tissue.

Production of ghrelin is part of your circadian rhythm (your “body clock”) and peaks and dips many times throughout the day.  Because ghrelin is strongly associated with an empty stomach, it gives one a compelling reason to eat smaller amounts, more frequently, ultimately regulating ghrelin’s influential power, not to mention your blood sugar (low blood sugar also triggers ghrelin release).

4) Neuropeptide Y: Watch out for this guy.  NPY’s effect is a desire to increase food intake, and promote the conversion of energy into fat storage. What causes elevated levels of NPY?  Stress, a high-fat and high-sugar diet, and high levels of abdominal fat.

This is huge!  Think about it.  Most people stressed out about losing weight want to stop their high-fat, high-sugar diets!  And yet, as a result of their lifestyle, they have uber-high levels of NPY circulating in their bodies, encouraging them to eat all the time!

5) Galanin: This is a neuropeptide is associated with your intake of fatty foods.  When you eat fat, you produce more galanin, and galanin in turn increases your desire for fatty foods.

Oh, and it gets better.  Alcohol consumption increases galanin, and galanin also increases your desire for alcohol. See “Why Alcohol Makes You Chubby.”

6) Cortisol: This is one of the most widely-reference culprits.  With good reason.  Cortisol is the “stress hormone,” released by the adrenal gland.  Stress is a fact of life, no doubt.  But excessive stress (hence, elevated levels of cortisol) is more powerful than even the best diet and exercise program.

I’m serious.  Even if you’re doing everything by the book, stress alone will make you retain weight.  It makes you hungry.  It inhibits the production of serotonin. It interferes with sleep.  And it promotes the storage of abdominal fat! Happiness and balance in life cannot be stressed enough!

See, “Your Hormones: How They Affect Your Weight (part 2: Cortisol)”

Wow, so in light of all this information, what should we do?  Stay tuned.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Resources:

http://www.balancedweightmanagement.com/Understand%20Brain%20Chemistry%20and%20Weight.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin#Effects_of_food_content

http://www.faqs.org/nutrition/Met-Obe/Mood-Food-Relationships.html

http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/88/7/2999

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuropeptide_Y

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/17856.php

Meal-Timing & Calorie-Protein Values

Eating small meals throughout the day is one of the most effective ways to promote the loss of body fat, while still fuelling the body properly for strenuous training.  Unfortunately, few people know how to plan ahead effectively, and either fail to prepare enough food to fuel them throughout the day, or fail to make time to consume food throughout the day.

Here are a few tips:

1) Make a time sheet, listing the hours of the day down the page.  By each approximate hour, label where you eat Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner.  See where the gaps are, and plug in three Snacks so that at no point in the day will there be a space exceeding 3 hours without food.

2) Next, allocate calories, making sure to front-load them.   If your calorie goal is 2,000 per day, you could eat 500 per Main Meal, and then distribute the remaining over the other three Snacks.  The sheet will show you when you are supposed to eat next, and the approximate number of calories you should consume at that time.  Don’t sell yourself short and “save” calories for later.  This is a poor choice for the metabolism.  Eat 2/3 of your daily calories by dinner time.

3) Know your portions.  Estimating calories isn’t easy.  Different foods are prepared with varying amounts of inputs like water, sugar, and fat.  Size can be deceptive.  This is another reason one should eat a whole food diet.  Even though it may be less exact than a packaged food listing the calories for you, you’ll be “safer” and will have a hard time over-doing your calories.  Whole foods are very filling.

The following is a very general guide to whole foods portion sizes and calorie values (very general, but it’ll work just fine):

WHOLE GRAINS: brown rice, quinoa, whole wheat angel hair pasta, barley, wheat berries, thick rolled oats

>>>>  1 cup = 250 calories, 5g of protein = the size of your fist, an 8-oz coffee mug

BREAD: 100% hearty whole wheat/grain

>>>> 1 slice = 120 calories, 5g of protein = nice thick, heavy store-bough pre-cut slice,

>>>>100 grams = 250 calories, 10g protein = about as much as a deck of cards weighs

BEANS: kidney, garbanzo, black, white, lentils, split peas

>>>> 1 cup = 250-290 calories, 12-17g of protein = the size of your fist, an 8-oz coffee mug

POULTRY, EGGS, HAM:

>>>>3 oz chicken = 100 calories, 21g of protein = the size of a deck of cards

>>>>3 oz turkey = 90 calories, 21g of protein = the size of a deck of cards

>>>>1 large egg = 80 calories, 6g or protein = most eggs are large

>>>>3 oz ham = 90 calories, 16g of protein = the size of a deck of cards

FISH:

>>>>3 oz salmon = 150 calories, 21g of protein = the size of a deck of cards

>>>>3 oz cod = 90 calories, 21 of of protein = the size of a deck of cards

MILK: skim, 2%, and whole (respectively)

>>>>1 cup = 90, 120, 150 calories; 8 g of protein = the size of a regular coffee mug

YOGURT: plain nonfat, lowfat, whole (respectively)

>>>>1 cup = 120, 130, 150 calories; 12, 10, 8g of protein = the size of a regular coffee mug

CHEESE: cheddar, cottage, cream cheese

>>>>`1 oz cheddar = 110 calories, 7g of protein = 1 cubic inch

>>>> 1/2 cup cottage cheese (non-fat, 2%, regular fat) = 70, 90, 110 calories, 13g of protein = 1/2 a regular coffee mug

>>>>1/2 oz cream cheese = 50 calories, 1 g of protein = 1 tablespoon

NUTS: as a group, averaged

>>>>1 oz = 175 calories, 5 g of protein = 1 cupped handful

>>>>1 oz peanut butter = 100 calories, 4 g of protein = 1 tablespoon

FRUITS:

>>>>1 large banana = 120 calories, 1.5 g of protein = 8″

>>>>1 large apple/pear =110 calories, 5.g of protein = bigger than a tennis ball

>>>>1 large peach/orange = 70 calories, 1g of protein = bigger than a tennis ball

>>>>1 cup of berries = 70 calories, 1g of protein = size of your fist

VEGETABLES: as a group, averaged

>>>>1 cup = 30-60 calories, 1-3g of protein = size of your fist

When you’re trying to shed body fat, but still gain muscle, you have to be wise about your protein consumption.  A person only needs 5-15% of his total daily calories derived from protein to remain healthy.  If you only ate plant-derived foods, and consumed a sufficient number of calories per day, you would get enough protein.  When exercising often at high intensities, however, the body will want more protein.  This protein by no means is absolutely necessary, but it will take significantly longer to make the same grains in strength, fitness, and recovery if only 5-15% of your caloric intake is represented by protein.

For this reason, I have listed not only general calorie values, but also general protein values.  If your goal is body fat reduction and increased performance, you should be sure that you are getting a good portion of protein with every meal, and a little with almost every snack.

Here’s an example:

BREAKFAST = 1 cup of whole oats cooked in 1 cup of 2% milk.  = 370 calories, 13g protein

SNACK = I cup of lowfat yogurt with a sliced banana =  240 calories, 11g protein

LUNCH = Turkey (2 oz=60 cals) sandwich on 100% whole wheat bread(2 slices=240), with cheddar cheese (1oz=110 cals), mustard(15), mayo(75), tomato, lettuce. = 500 calories, 31g protein

SNACK = handful of nuts = 175 calories, 5g protein

SNACK = 1 apple = 110 calories, 0.5g protein

DINNER = 1 cup of brown rice, side of broccoli, baked salmon (2 oz) = 380 clories, 32g of protein

>>>> GRAND TOTAL = 1775 calories, 92.5 g of protein!

What have we accomplished here?  A low-calorie, low-maintenance, whole foods, high-protein diet (RDA is 60g protein per day for a 25+ year-old male).   Protein hides everywhere; as long as you eat often, eat a variety, and eat enough, there is no reason why you wouldn’t get sufficient protein.  This diet was created to resemble attainable eating habits of the average person who meets with me in my training office.

Eggs, protein powder, cottage cheese, and legumes are other foods that were left off this mock-up diet, and would have easily raised the protein intake.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers