Preservatives on FRESH produce: buyer beware.

It isn’t unthinkable at all.  Another gift from the FDA.  See: http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm091368.htm

If you’re like me and you try to avoid processed food because it is denatured, adulterated, bastardized, and a host of other dirty words, then you’ll be pissed off to know that the FDA actually allows preservatives on fresh produce.  We’re all familiar with “wax” on our apples.  But it isn’t actually wax.

The document on the FDA site is long and frustrating.  But here’s an excerpt:

Edible films may consist of four basic materials: lipids, resins, polysaccharides and proteins (Baldwin and others 1995). Plasticizers such as glycerol as well as cross-linking agents, antimicrobials, antioxidants, and texture agents can be added to customize the film for a specific use (Guilbert and others 1996). Plasticizers have the specific effect of increasing water vapor permeability. Therefore, their addition must be considered when calculating the desired water vapor properties of each specific film, since too much moisture can create ideal growth conditions for some foodborne pathogens. The most common plasticizer used to cast edible films is food-grade polyethylene glycol, which is used to reduce film brittleness (Koelsch 1994).

At first glace, you wouldn’t think this excerpt pertains to your food–your salads, in fact.  But they do.  These “waxy” or “plastic-like” compounds are numerous and variable, depending on the type of produce being preserved.

Whole foods aren’t whole anymore.  They’re sprayed with a bunch of crap derived from other foods, substances, or synthetic chemistry.  And while they are apparently effective in preventing earlier spoilage, they are also sometimes effective at creating neat little conditions for bad pathogens to grow.  With any widespread system, there can be acute vulnerabilities.

Without going into laborious detail about each of the substances implemented in the films, I’ll conclude by drilling home the following point: fresh food is better.  Fresh, as in picked recently–not as in freshness preserved.  These plastic-like preservatives are another band-aid holding the industrial food system (one giant ball of used bandaids) together.

Fresh is better.  The fresh, local, sustainable foods system is the one richest in variety, richest in local environmental properties, richest in community investment, richest in good “food karma.”

If you find these waxy films on your lettuce, you’re not buying fresh enough.  Your purchasing power is exactly that: power–power to engender quality food from a strong, independent, quality food system.

Remember that before you buy something that goes directly into your mouth.

You are what you eat.

Raw vs. Cooked: Understanding The Effect of Cooking on Micronutrients

Cooking is not harmless in respect to the destruction of vitamins, the elimination of minerals, and the fabrication of carcinogenic substances. Raw foodists advocate eating everything uncooked, in order to preserve the most nutrition possible, as well as enzymes within food, and to avoid the toxins that come about from cooking.

While it is indisputable that cooking alters a food’s structure and much of its chemistry, the value of cooking should not be ignored. Arguably as one of the things that defined modern humans, cooking is indispensable for the ingestion of many different foods, and it is not always as destructive as it is portrayed.

It is well established that the consumption of many fruits and vegetables correlates highly with the prevention of disease. Research by LB Link, et al., by compiling the data of 49 studies, investigated the difference between raw vegetables and cooked vegetables and their correlations with cancer. The difference, in favor of raw vegetables, was only marginal.1

There are other threats beyond cancer (such as age and fatigue induced by excessive digestive effort) and raw foodists argue on behalf of the enzymes within food—the very same which will make an apple ripen with time—which, theoretically, help digest a food for you. They are destroyed when food is cooked beyond a temperature of 118 degrees Farenheit. It is still being debated whether these food enzymes contribute significantly to digestion, or if they are destroyed immediately by stomach acid.

Anyone passionate about cooking, but still unsure about whether they are consuming adequate living enzymes will benefit from eating germinated seeds and grains, and fermented products, which provide more enzymes and nutrition than their non-germinated and non-fermented original counterparts.

There are a number of foods which should not be eaten raw, notably potatoes and yams, and non-germinated cereals and legumes. Cooking modifies the nature of these starchy foods, destroying toxic parts (such as an alkaloid named solanine in potatoes) and making others palatable.

For vegetables, cooking often improves flavor, and in some, unlocks the availability of certain nutrients otherwise hindered by the food’s raw form (cooking enhances to availability of vitamins A and E in broccoli). While unlocking the availability of some nutrients, cooking contributes to losses of some others, especially Vitamin C.

One line commonly used in the raw food community is that cooking “completely destroys nutrients,” or that your food will be “completely devoid of nutrition.” This is false.

The destruction of vitamins is highly variable, depending on the mode and duration of cooking; additionally, the amount of destruction varies with each vitamin. Only a few vitamins—Vitamin A, Thiamine, Pantothenic Acid, Folate, and Vitamin C—are particularly affected by heat.2 Minerals are stable under heat (but cooking can still induce losses).

Indeed, some nutrients can be lost (as opposed to bastardized or destroyed) by cooking, but if you have a reasonably varied diet, with an emphasis on plant-based foods to begin with, you can easily account for losses.

The fat soluble vitamins—A, D, E, and K—are actually well conserved in hot water (when steaming or boiling) and can be ingested so long as the cooking water is saved (such as in a soup, or stock, or tea). Though brocolli is often referenced as an example of a vegetable whose fat-soluble vitamin availability increases as a result of cooking, this is not the case for all vegetables (red pepper, as a contrary example, loses up to 15% of Vitamins A and E).

The destruction of the aforementioned water soluble vitamins is of much greater concern. For Vitamin C, losses range from 10-50% (highest losses in boiled vegetables, from which the water is thrown away). For Thiamine, 10-35%; Riboflavin, 10-35%, Pyridoxine, <10-40%; Folate, up to 55%3 Deficiency in most of these vitamins is rare, so don’t worry too much.

All plant foods, particularly fruits and vegetabls, have constituents that are not directly involved with nutrition, but do confer health benefits—namely antioxidants, of which cartenoids and polyphenols are the most well-known. Many antioxidants are quite fragile against heat and can be destoyed; yet equally, cooking enhances the availability of others (such as lycopene in tomatoes). It simply depends on the antioxidant.

For cereals, the most common method of cooking is to boil. We know that boiling causes either destruction or losses of vitamins; hence, when cooking grains, be sure that all the water has been absorbed by the grain or evaporated to maximize nutrient retention. Cereals are richest in B vitamins which are, with the exception of Thiamine, stable under heat.

For legumes, with the exception of lentils, be sure to soak them overnight before cooking. Throw out the soak water and re-cover the legumes with cold water and place over the stove to ensure a gradual climb in temperature. Allow them to simmer—not to boil—until the water is absorbed. This will ensure the highest nutrient retention.

For meat and fish, vitamin losses also occur, but it is more important to cook with caution in order to avoid the formation of carcinogenic substances. If meat and fish are cooked in hot water or steamed, or cooked in a crock pot, there is a good conservation of vitamins and minerals, and not much risk of forming carcinogenic substances. Frying causes greater losses and a risk of the formation of carcinogenic substances, especially with high temperatures and prolonged cooking. Grilling is particularly destructive, and it carries a much higher potential for toxic byproducts.

In summary, in order to retain as much nutrition as possible through cooking, avoid prolonged cooking times, especially for produce. Avoid high temperatures (slow-cooking is preferable, and keep pots and dishes covered to conserve energy). Also, save cooking water whenever possible.

>>>>>>>>>>>

1Link LB, et al. Raw versus cooked vegetables and cancer tisk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13 (9): 1422-35. See: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/13/9/1422.full

2http://www.beyondveg.com/tu-j-l/raw-cooked/raw-cooked-2e.shtml

3Aubert, Claude. L’art de Cuisiner Sain, Terre Vivant, Mens, France, 2011.

Whole Foods Market & Friends Encourage Co-Existence of Organic & GM

Approximately 2/3 of the products sold by Whole Foods Market and their main distributor, United Natural Foods (UNFI) are not certified organic, but rather are conventional (chemical-intensive and GMO-tainted) foods and products disguised as “natural.” — Ronnie Cummings, The Organic Consumer’s Association

I’m devastated to hear it, but not in the least bit surprised.  For several years, I have had the convenience of either living near, or working near the well-known giant in organic, “natural”, and to some extent artisan foods giant, “Whole Paycheck.”

And yes, while Whole Foods is pricey, consumers didn’t shy away from the booming organic and natural movement.  Our willingness to pay such a higher percentage of our income on these foods demonstrates consumer values.

It also demonstrates consumer ignorance.

Don’t be misled by labels, and don’t be misled by advertising.  Images on cartons of milk showing happy, grass-fed cows are still far from illustrating the truth.  Just because something costs more doesn’t make it better.

To understand the aforementioned quote–to know how such a deception is still possible, and legal–see “What you’re REALLY eating (part 3): don’t be misguided by food labels.”

Why post the quote at all?  It came from “The Organic Elite Surrenders To Monsanto,” by Ronnie Cummings, which describes how Whole Foods and other major names are simply tired of dealing with their cranky, demanding consumer base.  Because $9 billion of their sales is represented by the non-organic, GM-containing products, it is easier to continue raking in profits by sweeping the issue under the rug.

Most consumers, believe it or not (my readership is not representative of “most consumers,”) cannot sufficiently qualify a difference between natural and organic.  The industry will rely on this ignorance to perpetuate sales after the wake of outrage from more conscious consumers.

Retail stores like WFM and wholesale distributors like UNFI have failed to educate their customers about the qualitative difference between natural and certified organic, conveniently glossing over the fact that nearly all of the processed “natural” foods and products they sell contain GMOs, or else come from a “natural” supply chain where animals are force-fed GMO grains in factory farms or Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). –OCA

Thanks to people like me (in my nascent health-and-environment-conscious stages also couldn’t tell you the difference between natural and organic, and due to a lack of funds, felt warm and fuzzy with my “natural” purchases all the same) a problem seeded itself in ignorance, then grew mightily in the organic-natural grocery boom.

…well-intentioned but misled consumers have boosted organic and “natural” purchases to $80 billion annually-approximately 12% of all grocery store sales.  —OCA

While organic took profits away from conventional, “conventional natural” took profits back.

How much progress have we made, really?

Know your labelsKnow what you’re buying.

Raw / Living Foods Morning Mousse

I’m into keeping food simple and nutritious, but also quick to prepare.

In a blender, place:

2-3 small very ripe bananas

1 medium avacado

1 handful of soaked almonds, or a generous TB of tahini.

2 TB of cacao powder.

A splash of water.

 

What you get is a smooth, somewhat frothy, “mousse”–a nutrient-rich, balanced, raw food chocolate shake.  It’s packed with fiber, sweetness, antioxidants, good fats, and a reasonable amount of protein.

Brain Chemistry and Hunger: What’s Making You Want To Eat?

Gluttony is a plague on Western society.

…But this isn’t exactly news.  We all know the “SAD” diet (Standard American Diet) is a disgraceful binge on saturated fat, trans fat, high-glycemic carbohydrates, refined and de-natured foods.  This is a recipe for fat bodies and poor health.

Oh, yes, and there’s plenty of advice about how to eat less. You’ve heard it before:

Chew your food thoroughly.  Don’t eat in front of the TV.  Avoid high GI foods that trigger cravings.  Chug a glass of water before your meals.  Avoid “grazing.”  Don’t dine out so often.  Give yourself “small allowances,” but stick to your plan!  Give it time, your stomach will “shrink” and you’ll feel more full on less food.

Blah!  Blah!  Blah!

This helps a few, but I’m interested in knowing why, when I try to re-duce my own calorie consumption (even modestly), it feels like some kind of switch has been flipped, and my brain screams, “Eat, dammit!  Eat everything you can find!”

Hunger is an extremely complex subject–too vast to cover in a single article.  But I would like to address the aforementioned “switch.”  The chemistry behind it…

Hunger and Brain Chemistry

Everything boils down to chemistry.  Your emotions, your metabolism, physiology.  Your relationship with food is one of chemistry.

1) Serotonin: The happy neurotransmitter!  It regulates mood, sleep, muscle contraction.  You know what else?  Hunger! It suppresses it.  Most of your serotonin is located in your GI tract, where it regulates intestinal movement.  This chemical is released when you eat carbohydrates.

Your overall diet has the greatest influence of your level of serotonin.  The amino acid tryptophan is the building block of serotonin, but ingested through protein-rich food, tryptophan has a hard time making it past the blood brain barrier, due to competition with other amino acids.  When carboyhdrates are consumed, thereby raising blood sugar and insulin release, those competing amino acids get directed to the muscles, leaving tryptophan free to do its work in promoting serotonin.

2) Dopamine, Norepinephrine: These neurotransmitters influence your level of alertness, which includes your ability to concentrate and your reaction times. Your body produces more dopamine and norepinephrine when you eat protein-rich foods. Proteins are chains of amino acids, and the relevant amino acid here is tyrosine.

That’s nice to know, but what’s it all mean?  Dopamine is an extremely powerful neurotransmitter, associated with all kinds of mood disorders and addictive behaviors.  It’s the “reward” chemical.  Your diet-related addiction to dopamine can have a severe impact on your eating patters–particularly in matters pertaining to hunger vs. satisfaction!

Hunger is physiology; satisfaction is psychology.

We love dopamine.  There’s no way around it.  And we love foods that contribute to our levels of dopamine.  Unfortunately, eating lots of protein-rich foods (filling you up temporarily) actually inhibits your gains in serotonin (the appetite-suppressing chemical). The body has a very difficult time deciding whether to digest carbohydrates or proteins, because these different foodstuffs require different PH balances in the stomach.

Ahh, but combine protein and carbohydrates (ice cream, anyone?) and you have a nuclear weapon against your brain. On the one hand, the serotonin derived from the sugar will give you a life, and on the other hand, the opioid behavior from the dairy protein with sedate you wonderfully.

3) Ghrelin: This is the only known “hunger hormone.”  It is extremely persuasive.  In fact, it is more persuasive that any of your satiety hormones.  Ghrelin is produced when the stomach is empty.  It says, “Fill me!”  Individuals who have had gastric bypass surgery end up with lower levels of ghrelin, because the surgery reduces the amount of ghrelin-producing tissue.

Production of ghrelin is part of your circadian rhythm (your “body clock”) and peaks and dips many times throughout the day.  Because ghrelin is strongly associated with an empty stomach, it gives one a compelling reason to eat smaller amounts, more frequently, ultimately regulating ghrelin’s influential power, not to mention your blood sugar (low blood sugar also triggers ghrelin release).

4) Neuropeptide Y: Watch out for this guy.  NPY’s effect is a desire to increase food intake, and promote the conversion of energy into fat storage. What causes elevated levels of NPY?  Stress, a high-fat and high-sugar diet, and high levels of abdominal fat.

This is huge!  Think about it.  Most people stressed out about losing weight want to stop their high-fat, high-sugar diets!  And yet, as a result of their lifestyle, they have uber-high levels of NPY circulating in their bodies, encouraging them to eat all the time!

5) Galanin: This is a neuropeptide is associated with your intake of fatty foods.  When you eat fat, you produce more galanin, and galanin in turn increases your desire for fatty foods.

Oh, and it gets better.  Alcohol consumption increases galanin, and galanin also increases your desire for alcohol. See “Why Alcohol Makes You Chubby.”

6) Cortisol: This is one of the most widely-reference culprits.  With good reason.  Cortisol is the “stress hormone,” released by the adrenal gland.  Stress is a fact of life, no doubt.  But excessive stress (hence, elevated levels of cortisol) is more powerful than even the best diet and exercise program.

I’m serious.  Even if you’re doing everything by the book, stress alone will make you retain weight.  It makes you hungry.  It inhibits the production of serotonin. It interferes with sleep.  And it promotes the storage of abdominal fat! Happiness and balance in life cannot be stressed enough!

See, “Your Hormones: How They Affect Your Weight (part 2: Cortisol)”

Wow, so in light of all this information, what should we do?  Stay tuned.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Resources:

http://www.balancedweightmanagement.com/Understand%20Brain%20Chemistry%20and%20Weight.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin#Effects_of_food_content

http://www.faqs.org/nutrition/Met-Obe/Mood-Food-Relationships.html

http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/88/7/2999

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuropeptide_Y

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/17856.php

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 48 other followers