Against The Grain: Effects From Starch In The Diet

The human digestive tract is a subject of great controversy.  Those professing that humans are innately carnivorous, herbivorous, or omnivorous argue at length about the differences in cheeks, teeth, stomach acids, length of intestines, etc.  My readers already know that I lean toward the herbivorous side of things, but do agree that small amounts of animal-based foods are beneficial.  Everything in moderation, after all.

The subject of carbohydrates is also highly controversial.  Everyone agrees that sugar (a carbohydrate) is harmful in our modern amounts–especially fructose when it doesn’t come directly from a fruit.  For non-fruit-and-vegetable carbohydrates, such as beans and grains, the jury is still out.

Gluten, a protein found in high quantities in wheat, is getting the spotlight as everyone’s new favorite fad diet.  ”Gluten free” is a popular labeling tool to make consumers feel all warm as fuzzy about their purchase.  My co-worker reported not too long ago that his shampoo bottle said “gluten free.” “It’s not like I’m going to drink the stuff!” he exclaimed.  So what’s all the hype about gluten, starch, and carbs in general?  Are they good for us?  Bad for us? Do they make us fat?

Before we go into it, let’s take a look at digestion…

The digestive process can be divided into two main categories: mechanical and chemical.  Mechanical is simple: processing a food, and chewing it.  Chemical digestion, however, is a little more complicated.  It occurs in the mouth, the stomach, and the small intestine.  Digestive action is dependent on receptors that send messages to the brain, which responds sequentially by sending water, digestive enzymes (from the pancreas), enzyme precursors, coenzymes, electrolytes, acids, bases, buffer salts, hormones, and more.

Chemical digestion begins in the mouth with the secretion of amylase, an enzyme that breaks down starch.  Stomach acid, however, neautralizes amylase and effectively stops starch digestion, until it is resumed again in the small intestine (considering that carbohydrates are quick to leave the stomach, this makes sense).    Protein digestion is mechanical in the mouth (not chemical); protein is broken from long to short chains of amino acids in the stomach’s hydrochloric acid.

When starches are consumed without proteins, the acidity of the stomach approaches neutral and it will not hinder starch digestion.  When proteins are consumed without starches, stomach acid becomes strong.  But when starches and proteins are consumed at the same time (a hamburger, chicken and rice?), the body must provide two opposing digestive mediums, and it cannot.  The result is impaired or partial starch digestion and impaired or partial protein digestion.

Partial grain digestion can have adverse health effects.  ”Undigested particles of grain get stuck in the microvilli of our intestinal walls, building up with time, ultimately undermining our ability to properly digest other foods because of this interference. If the interference becomes extreme, a host of intestinal and auto-immune disorders can result including leaky gut syndrome, gluten intolerance, celiac disease, and irritable bowel syndrome,” (Kristen M., from foodrenegade.com).

Partial animal protein digestion also causes problems.  Animal proteins contain no fiber and so they pass through the digestive tract more slowly.  In the words of Dr. Douglas N. Graham, a leading spokesman for raw foods, “At one hundred degrees, in a dark, wet environment, undigested meat will go bad (rot) rather rapidly.  The partial digestion of meat that occurs when it is eaten with grains very often accounts for the putrefication so obvious when feces are expelled.”

Grains don’t putrefy.  But they do ferment, producing some ethanol (alcohol) and gas.  While there is nothing inherently harmful about gas, alcohol does not belong in the body, as it is a poison that kills cells with which it comes into contact.  Alcohol is also an addictive substance.

Chemists have also discovered over a dozen separate opiates in wheat (opium is a narcotic known for its addictive and sedating qualities), which explains the “brain fog” people often report from too much gluten.  Turning to a high energy food that leaves you feeling drugged and addicted is not advisable.

Gluten in most starchy foods is mucous-forming, leading to congestion and impaired breathing.  Due to this, as well as their digestive speed, starches (particularly wheat) are ill-advised for athletes.  Starches are recommended due to their slow release of energy, but from an athlete’s point of view (athletes demand rapid energy release), this makes little sense.  Eating a complex carbohydrate after a training sessions has the athlete waiting for hours before he obtains any benefit, and by then, the receptors for glycogen storage are less sensitive, leading to delayed glycogen repletion.

Slow digestion requires much more digestive energy, when compared to the rapid digestion of fruits, resulting in lower “net” energy.  Simple sugar is the body’s preferred source of energy: glucose and fructose.  The two behave very differently in the body.  Glucose goes right to the blood stream to fuel muscles and cells.  Fructose gets metabolized into the liver and is converted into fat (roughly 30%–an evolutionary survival strategy, I’m sure) and glycogen (the fuel reserve for the muscles and brain).

Sugar and starch (which breaks down into sugar) are highly addictive–sugar, primarily, because we are hard-wired to seek sweet foods as naturally bioavailable sources of energy; and both sugar and starch (high-glycemic starch, really… like flour products and processed grains), due to their direct influence on serotonin (the happy neurotransmitter) levels.  Once released, serotonin elevates the mood, having a powerful effect on our demeanor.  Cravings for sugary and starchy foods are typically your brain’s attempt to make you feel better.

If that weren’t enough, there are the acid-forming properties of grain that should be considered.  Grains (and beans, nuts, and seeds) contain phytic acid (phytic acid is tightly bound in the phosphorus content of grains and legumes, especially the bran portion of grain or the outer layer of legumes. It is considered the “principle storage form of phoshorus.”).  The human body is more alkaline, and a diet high in acid-forming foods leads to blood acidification, de-mineralization (and alkaline minerals are pulled from the body’s reserves in order to neutralize acid), and inflammation.

Grains only entered the human diet about 10,000 years ago–a mere blink in evolutionary time.  Traditional human societies all found ways of coping with phytic acid.  According to Kimi Harris, author of thenourishinggourmet.com, “Phytase is the enzyme generally present in phytic containing grains and legumes that neutralizes phytic acid. Sprouting, soaking and fermenting raw grains allows phytase to become activated, which then reduces the phytic acid. We as humans do produce some phytase in our bodies, which explains why some can eat a high, unsoaked whole grain diet without negative impact. Since lactobacilli and other digestive microflora can also produce phytase, those of us with a robust intestinal health will have a much easier time digesting grains, soaked or unsoaked.  But regardless, all of us can benefit from less phytic acid in our grains.”

  • Sprouting — This is when the whole grain kernel is sprouted.
  • Soaking — This is when the already milled whole grain flour is soaked in an acidic medium like buttermilk, whey, yogurt, lemon juice, or vinegar before being cooked.
  • Fermenting — This is when the grain is naturally fermented with wild yeast, as is the case with all sourdough breads.

More recently, due to the Industrial Revolution and the hyper-mechanization of grain milling, the advent of processing techniques to increase shelf life, the saturation of refined carbohydrate products into supermarkets, and the subsidization of grain production, never have grains been so negatively influential in the human diet.  We have abandoned most of our traditional processing methods.

So what to do?  Should we stop eating grain?

No.  But consider the following tips:

1) Grain should not dominate the diet.  The majority of carbohydrates should be sourced some whole fruits and vegetables.  Too often we see individuals who consume scarce amounts of fresh produce and subsist off cheap, easy-to-eat grain products.  Grain should be an accompaniment, not a centerpiece of the dinner plate.

2) Avoid as much as possible (consider the true social impact of eschewing all of it) hyper-processed grain products like most store-bought bread, cakes, cookies, pastas, pita chips, crackers, pancakes, etc.

3) Eat a variety of whole grains, and consider soaking, sprouting, or fermenting them before consumption if you suspect you have impaired digestion.

4) Abandon the old starch-and-protein paradigm, to improve digestion.  Whole grains are a great morning recommendation, as they do give slow-releasing energy for daily activity and concentration.  They are fiber-rich and increase satiety.  Save your protein for later in the day, especially after your training sessions, in order to give your body the building blocks it needs when it shifts into repair mode (rest and sleep); or, eat protein separately as a small snack.

The Benefits Of Sprouting

It’s important not to destory your vitamins. But even if you do everything right, it does not guarantee that you will get enough. Augmenting the vitamin content of your food is possible through sprouting.

Sprouting grains and seeds is a fascinating process. Just a tablespoon of seeds can transform into a hundred times its original mass. More remarkable than this is that the original seed, quite low in micro-nutrients, transforms into a nutrient powerhouse. Vitamin C, for example, can multiply 100 to 200 fold; B vitamins easily quintuple. Even the content of amino acids augments; lysine in wheat rises by 50%, and 10-35% in other grains.1

Gram for gram, “As an example, a sprouted Mung Bean has a carbohydrate content of a melon, vitamin A of a lemon, thiamin of an avocado, riboflavin of a dry apple, niacin of a banana, and ascorbic acid of a loganberry.”2

Sprouing constitutes a form of “pre-digestion,” by breaking down phytic acid, present in all cereals and legumes, which interferes with the body’s ability to absorb calcium and magenesium. It also helps pre-digest oligiosacchrides (starches famous for causing gas) by transforming part of that difficult starch into simple sugars.

Given that sprouts are pre-digested, and considering their enormous nutrient-content, they are a far more efficient food than their non-germinated counterparts.

Germination is not a recent practice; don’t think that raw foodists popularized it as a last-ditch effort to convince you that grains and legumes can be eaten raw. They can. Sprouting has a very long history, among many disparate peoples. Even more, where do you think beer comes from?

Consider this: food security. Grains and seeds keep for long periods of time, ready to sprout as soon as you decide to water them. During colder seasons, when fresh produce becomes scarcer, sprouts are an ample source of nurtrition. Even when you stop watering them and stick them in the fridge, they will continue to grow slowly, gaining nutrition; whereas, fruits and vegetables picked and purchased from the supermarket only lose nutrition over time.

Start sprouting!

>>>

1Aubert, Claude. L’art de Cuisiner Sain, Terre Vivant, Mens, France, 2011.

2http://www.living-foods.com/articles/sprouts.html

Raw vs. Cooked: Understanding The Effect of Cooking on Micronutrients

Cooking is not harmless in respect to the destruction of vitamins, the elimination of minerals, and the fabrication of carcinogenic substances. Raw foodists advocate eating everything uncooked, in order to preserve the most nutrition possible, as well as enzymes within food, and to avoid the toxins that come about from cooking.

While it is indisputable that cooking alters a food’s structure and much of its chemistry, the value of cooking should not be ignored. Arguably as one of the things that defined modern humans, cooking is indispensable for the ingestion of many different foods, and it is not always as destructive as it is portrayed.

It is well established that the consumption of many fruits and vegetables correlates highly with the prevention of disease. Research by LB Link, et al., by compiling the data of 49 studies, investigated the difference between raw vegetables and cooked vegetables and their correlations with cancer. The difference, in favor of raw vegetables, was only marginal.1

There are other threats beyond cancer (such as age and fatigue induced by excessive digestive effort) and raw foodists argue on behalf of the enzymes within food—the very same which will make an apple ripen with time—which, theoretically, help digest a food for you. They are destroyed when food is cooked beyond a temperature of 118 degrees Farenheit. It is still being debated whether these food enzymes contribute significantly to digestion, or if they are destroyed immediately by stomach acid.

Anyone passionate about cooking, but still unsure about whether they are consuming adequate living enzymes will benefit from eating germinated seeds and grains, and fermented products, which provide more enzymes and nutrition than their non-germinated and non-fermented original counterparts.

There are a number of foods which should not be eaten raw, notably potatoes and yams, and non-germinated cereals and legumes. Cooking modifies the nature of these starchy foods, destroying toxic parts (such as an alkaloid named solanine in potatoes) and making others palatable.

For vegetables, cooking often improves flavor, and in some, unlocks the availability of certain nutrients otherwise hindered by the food’s raw form (cooking enhances to availability of vitamins A and E in broccoli). While unlocking the availability of some nutrients, cooking contributes to losses of some others, especially Vitamin C.

One line commonly used in the raw food community is that cooking “completely destroys nutrients,” or that your food will be “completely devoid of nutrition.” This is false.

The destruction of vitamins is highly variable, depending on the mode and duration of cooking; additionally, the amount of destruction varies with each vitamin. Only a few vitamins—Vitamin A, Thiamine, Pantothenic Acid, Folate, and Vitamin C—are particularly affected by heat.2 Minerals are stable under heat (but cooking can still induce losses).

Indeed, some nutrients can be lost (as opposed to bastardized or destroyed) by cooking, but if you have a reasonably varied diet, with an emphasis on plant-based foods to begin with, you can easily account for losses.

The fat soluble vitamins—A, D, E, and K—are actually well conserved in hot water (when steaming or boiling) and can be ingested so long as the cooking water is saved (such as in a soup, or stock, or tea). Though brocolli is often referenced as an example of a vegetable whose fat-soluble vitamin availability increases as a result of cooking, this is not the case for all vegetables (red pepper, as a contrary example, loses up to 15% of Vitamins A and E).

The destruction of the aforementioned water soluble vitamins is of much greater concern. For Vitamin C, losses range from 10-50% (highest losses in boiled vegetables, from which the water is thrown away). For Thiamine, 10-35%; Riboflavin, 10-35%, Pyridoxine, <10-40%; Folate, up to 55%3 Deficiency in most of these vitamins is rare, so don’t worry too much.

All plant foods, particularly fruits and vegetabls, have constituents that are not directly involved with nutrition, but do confer health benefits—namely antioxidants, of which cartenoids and polyphenols are the most well-known. Many antioxidants are quite fragile against heat and can be destoyed; yet equally, cooking enhances the availability of others (such as lycopene in tomatoes). It simply depends on the antioxidant.

For cereals, the most common method of cooking is to boil. We know that boiling causes either destruction or losses of vitamins; hence, when cooking grains, be sure that all the water has been absorbed by the grain or evaporated to maximize nutrient retention. Cereals are richest in B vitamins which are, with the exception of Thiamine, stable under heat.

For legumes, with the exception of lentils, be sure to soak them overnight before cooking. Throw out the soak water and re-cover the legumes with cold water and place over the stove to ensure a gradual climb in temperature. Allow them to simmer—not to boil—until the water is absorbed. This will ensure the highest nutrient retention.

For meat and fish, vitamin losses also occur, but it is more important to cook with caution in order to avoid the formation of carcinogenic substances. If meat and fish are cooked in hot water or steamed, or cooked in a crock pot, there is a good conservation of vitamins and minerals, and not much risk of forming carcinogenic substances. Frying causes greater losses and a risk of the formation of carcinogenic substances, especially with high temperatures and prolonged cooking. Grilling is particularly destructive, and it carries a much higher potential for toxic byproducts.

In summary, in order to retain as much nutrition as possible through cooking, avoid prolonged cooking times, especially for produce. Avoid high temperatures (slow-cooking is preferable, and keep pots and dishes covered to conserve energy). Also, save cooking water whenever possible.

>>>>>>>>>>>

1Link LB, et al. Raw versus cooked vegetables and cancer tisk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13 (9): 1422-35. See: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/13/9/1422.full

2http://www.beyondveg.com/tu-j-l/raw-cooked/raw-cooked-2e.shtml

3Aubert, Claude. L’art de Cuisiner Sain, Terre Vivant, Mens, France, 2011.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers